• tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Cons can grab majority but will be gridlocked on every move

    Genuine question, why the assumption of gridlock if the conservatives form government with a majority?

    • droopy4096
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      look at the numbers. NDP +Libs outnumber them in Parliament so anything they try to pass… including budget is in NDP+Libs hands… if budget does not pass… it’s auto-trigger for election if memory serves me right.

      • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        NDP +Libs outnumber them now, yes. I assumed by “Cons can grab majority” you meant a majority of seats following an election, no?

        • droopy4096
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          My understanding is that party with the most votes gets to form government, is it not so?

          • tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Right, the party with the most seats won would get first shot at forming government.

            If your assumption is that the Conservatives would win the next election with a majority, then they would be able to form government without needing to rely on any other party (like the Libs rely on the NDP now).

            Since political parties in parliamentary democracies typically vote uniformly, a majority party is generally able to pass legislation regardless of the position of opposition parties, which is why I questioned the presumption of gridlock.