• trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t necessarily disagree with your main point.

        Though the arguments you make will not work on anyone who doesn’t already agree with you.

        You kinda cope in there by saying that the governments that called themselves socialist in the past were democratic, which is kind of not true for a lot of them. There’s degrees to it but for the most part they weren’t.

        I think it’s smarter for us to distance ourselves from those governments as they ultimately didn’t really represent our views, not mine at least.

        The other problem is the Engels On Authority ass first paragraph, equating use of violence with authoritarianism.

        When you do thay you kinda just come off as an authoritarian if people aren’t already familiar with your definitions (similar to using the phrase dictatorship of the proletariat.)

        The argument is also just silly and I wish I could go back in time and stop it from entering the material world but I am too lazy to write about it. A lot of libertarian communists have written about it over the past century so you can probably fish something up if you look.

          • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I would love some examples here. The Soviets conducted elections. The Chinese conduct elections. The Koreans conduct elections. The Cubans conduct elections. The Vietnamese conduct elections.

            Comrades in this election you may democratically vote for the one candidate from our party, as the opponent tragically fell out of a window.

            And I pointedly disagree with this. When you say “I am a socialist but every other socialist government was bad” you are severely undercutting your own argument right out of the gate.

            When you associate yourself with authoritarian hellholes you become an unhinged weirdo to 90% of the population.

            It’s not the 1960s anymore, we know what these countries are/were like and if you really want to simp for them then don’t be surprised people think you hate democracy.

                  • nyctre@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    No, we were part of the majority that had money but nothing to spend it on because everything was rationed. From water and heating to tv time and groceries. There wasn’t enough of anything because everything was going to export so at least on paper everything looked great and so you get to say stuff like “wow, that grass painted with toxic paint sure looks green from over here!”

          • Vilian
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            bourgeois election influence ie PACs, donations, mass media campaigns, etc.

            you talk about bourgeois influence/propaganda, why you don’t care abut goverment propaganda?