While Cinnamon is great for many users, KDE Plasma provides a flexible and powerful alternative, particularly for those who desire a more dynamic and configurable desktop environment.

In this guide, we’ll cover everything you need to know to successfully install KDE Plasma on your Linux Mint 22 system.

  • n2burns
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    If you want KDE, why not use a KDE-distro? Any time I’ve installed a different Desktop Environment, I’ve found it pretty janky.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      About the only semi-exception is immutable distros, which can easily swap out the system layer. I’ve done it, and only had minor jank.

      Still, it’s better to know what you want ahead of time, if you want an opinionated installation; VMs and live ISOs are good for testing other DEs. Otherwise, you might as well get ready to do it the way Arch users do it.

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I fully support people playing around and possibly soft-breaking their things just for the heck of it.

      • n2burns
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Oh, I don’t disagree. I’ve definitely done some of that. I think I installed i3 or awesomeWM back on LM19.x/20.x. However, this is a guide that says things like, “For a smooth and trouble-free installation”. It seems to be aimed at a general audience when I think those people should just be re-directed to a KDE-distro.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a great learning experience. And if you’re diving into Linux, then learning things is going to have to happen sooner or later, and it doesn’t stop. So maybe consider it a prerequisite.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Definitely a valid approach and the most sensible. I think Mint may have some characteristics that people desire and so the distro is the first choice.

      I would, however, be interested in knowing what those are, because although I have nothing against Mint and, in fact, used it briefly years ago, I don’t get the appeal. But I do have an interest in understanding where it differs significantly - if it does at all - from, let’s say, Ubuntu.

      • n2burns
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve been using Linux Mint Cinnamon for years now, after distro-hopping for a decade. I think there’s 2 main reasons Mint has stuck:

        1. Cinnamon - I think it looks pretty while not being overly heavy (though I think that all DEs are pretty efficient nowadays, I’ll take all the performance I can get out of this 14-year-old ThinkPad x201). It has good features while operating fairly stable. It’s also stable in that there’s few drastic changes.

        2. Ubuntu, but slightly better - I like Ubuntu, and used it on-and-off for years (Warty through at least Precise), but Ubuntu’s made a lot of drastic changes over the years which messed with my workflow. Other changes I just disliked (ex Snaps), and I feel like they keep trying to force these changes on users. Whenever something’s hard or impossible on Mint, I feel it’s a technical challenge, not the distro actively preventing me from doing it. It’s nice to have a Ubuntu based distro because most instructions found online Just Work™.