Intel’s stock dropped around 30% overnight, shaving some $39 billion from the company’s market capitalization since rumors of a pending layoff first emerged. The devastating results come after the chip giant reported a loss for the second quarter, complained about yield issues with the Meteor Lake CPU, provided a modest business outlook for the next few quarters, and announced plans to lay off 15,000 people worldwide.

When the NYSE closed on July 31, Intel’s market capitalization was $130.86 billion. Then, a report about Intel’s massive layoffs was published, and the company’s market capitalization dropped sharply to $123.96 billion on August 1. Following Intel’s financial report yesterday, the company’s capitalization dropped to $91.86 billion. Essentially, Intel has lost half of its capitalization since January. As of now, Intel’s market value is a fraction of Nvidia’s worth and less than half of AMD’s.

As Intel’s actions look rather desperate, analysts believe that Intel’s challenges are existential. “Intel’s issues are now approaching the existential,” Stacy Rasgon, an analyst with Bernstein, told Reuters.

  • Aetherion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    This will happen to the whole tech industry. Once people realise that Moores law is dead. Intel is just the beginning and „A.I.“ will not safe them.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 months ago

      Intel also released two generations of CPUs that just die under heavy loads.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      If I got a snickers every time I heard moore law is dead I’d be obese.

      Any moment now, any moment.

      • tempest
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is dead.

        The only reason it seems like it’s not is because AMD server CPUs are just getting physically larger and larger

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Check out 3D stacked ram for example. Moores law isn’t about some size measure.

          And now I have to eat another snickers…

            • Valmond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Well yes exactly.

              Edit: you just showed the law is still alive and kicking:

              It is dead.

              The only reason it seems like it’s not is because AMD server CPUs are just getting physically larger and larger

              • tempest
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 months ago

                Fair enough.

                Though if density is irrelevant then the entire thing is meaningless.

                Should instead be talking about how large of a silicon wafer can be produced.

    • Nomecks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      You seriously think we’re going to slow down on infrastructure?

      • Zarcher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        The effort required to keep increasing resistors in a chip is just too high at some point. And the power required to run all the chips is becoming unsustainable. Besides that, hardware companies are way over valued if you look at earnings / market cap

      • hogmomma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        If you can tell what the person means, there’s no reason to publicly correct their spelling or grammar.

        • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hard disagree. Common mistakes ruin grammar because other people will adopt these. And when written language becomes ambiguous due to people not using proper grammar, that’s a very important foundation of “words have no meaning” fuzziness employed by populists, and in effect dumbs down people.

          • hogmomma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            I said “publicly.” I wasn’t commenting on the fact that you corrected someone, but the fact you did so publicly.

            • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              The mistake is public. This is where people see it and should also see the correction. The fact that you get your knickers in a twist over a simple word correction, is worrysome. It’s not like I said “lol u so dumb OP”.