• Zakkull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also its like you cant do math. An 8k return. No monthly deduction just about. Food stamps. Subsidise electricity. State healthcare. Paying about a grand less per month to live on top of an 8k return means he practically makes 20k more than me because he decided to have kids he couldnt afford.

      • htrayl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Your mindset is that kids are somehow encapsulated and isolated property and not full individuals who are lacking any real agency, who will grow up as member of the community to the quality that their upbringing allowed them.

        Spending money on ensuring children have healthy and safe childhoods is both the easiest moral and easiest social financial decision of all time.

        Children cannot decide to be alive, they cannot decide the environment they are in, they cannot decide their parents, or make any reasonable effort to change those circumstances. It doesn’t matter what decisions their parents make or made, we still have a choice to either let those without agency suffer or not.

        Beyond that, if you have the moral backbone of some worm, then think about this: children who grow up financially secure result in adults who are simply more productive and less costly than those who are not. To the point where an adult who had that security during childhood will easily contribute far more than it cost for that security. They are already earning their keep.

    • Zakkull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Damn almost like you shouldnt have them if you dont have that extra money. Doesnt seem like the government should just subsidise everyones children at my fucking expense.

      • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Do you want people to take care of you and keep your lights on and grow your food when you’re older?

        If yes (because you cannot provide all the complex goods and services you’ll need in your old age), you want people to have kids. The kids of today are the doctors, farmers, and power plant operators of tomorrow.

        People are not having enough kids, largely because of how expensive they are.

        As established, you want them to have kids so that you can stay alive as you age. Therefore, you will absolutely let them have their tax breaks.

        • Zakkull@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          Lmfao acting like ill get to benefit off other peoples children when im older and not just going to be left to fend for myself… you know… how it already fucking is. So no. Id prefer to save my own money so i can afford to set myself up when im older. Theres plenty to keep the lights on and grow food. Theres not enough to keep corporations breaking record profits. Dont fall for the fucking propaganda. And quit fucking punishing me for NOT having children i cant fucking afford.