Even then it’s not easy. They went through all the trouble of conceiving of a joke, drawing the and coloring the characters, and then they completely throw it all away by having the most difficult to read handwriting I’ve seen outside of a doctor’s office.

I’m not saying my handwriting is any better, but my work doesn’t hinge on legibility.

Holy bald-faced foreign propaganda, Batman!

Second world.

It’s actually the definition of second world.

THEN GET IN THERE AND CRANK YOUR HOG, BROTHER!

I can’t speak to the pencil moustache, but that’s a smoking jacket. It’s meant to be worn indoors while smoking to keep the worst of the smell off of your clothes.

A smoking jacket is allowed to be more loud and flamboyant because it’s only supposed to be worn in the house, so only your family and guests would see it. It’s not exactly the thing one would wear out and about.

IT’S ALL ABOUT BEING AWESOME AND CRANKING YOUR HOG! AROOOOOO

That’s not accurate.

You didn’t blame the baby cancer on capitalism and/or Israel.

Yeah, the guy’s team was writing “articles and blog posts promoting a tech company”.

Letting an LLM mangle that isn’t exactly a huge loss.

lolwut

I CAN’T HEAR YOUR SOCIAL COMMENTARY OVER THIS HOG I’M CRANKING, BROTHER

America bad, you see.

Therefore when America do good, is actually bad.

As everyone else has said, it’s a blood blister.

What hasn’t been mentioned is that those sometimes rise up through the skin instead of dissolving as they heal. If that happens, throw a bandage on it and keep it clean. Your usual wound care should be fine.

Wait, you’re telling me that reinvesting in the business instead of increasing dividends and executive pay increases profits in the long term?

Preposterous!

Stupid, sexy enemy.

Did you wave goodbye to the handle as you flew off of it?

I’m just waiting for some dipshit to wander in here and talk about how we need to “examine the relationship” with food and start calling it something like “people fuel” or some other bullshit term.

Amateur axeologist here.

This isn’t your “I’m going to chop down a tree” tool. The head of this thing was either for messing fools up, or for busting brush, not heavy use.

Given that, the structural weakness is worth it in this case. Pushing the axe head a little farther out lengthens the “handle” (gun) and provides more leverage. That leverage comes in handy when hacking through both bushes and fools.

Not really.

If you have a male antagonist, your movie fails the test unless you have a specific scene where you sideline two of your female characters to talk about something other than the plot.

Similarly, if the story has an ensemble that features any male characters you need to contrive a way to get rid of them for one scene just to check an arbitrary box.

Using this as anything other than a thought experiment ensures that once per story female characters will be demoted to side characters featuring in a meaningless dialogue scene.

Well? Any luck?

Are you sure? When was the last time you checked?