Many criticize ex-president’s appearance at Black journalists’ conference as irresponsible

On Monday night, the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ) announced that Donald Trump will participate in a panel discussion at the organization’s annual convention in Chicago, which starts on Wednesday.

The announcement, which said that the Q&A would “concentrate on the most pressing issues facing the Black community”, was met with swift online backlash from some Black journalists. They decried the decision to invite a presidential candidate who has lambasted Black journalists, led a movement to squash diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and who is responsible for increased anti-journalistic sentiment, including the popularization of the term “fake news” to describe factual, but potentially unflattering, reporting.

Tiffany Walden, a co-founder and editor-in-chief of The TRiiBE, a digital platform that focuses on Black Chicago, told the Guardian that NABJ’s decision was “irresponsible”.

  • ryan213
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe they’re playing to fuck him up by asking proper, unscripted questions?

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      91
      ·
      5 months ago

      i think someone in the article put it best

      If a super conservative white woman can’t get straight answers out of him, what makes you think that three black women are going to get them?”

        • finley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          in the same way a phlebotomist should still try to get blood from an actual stone?

          because - and with all due respect to journalists of all backgrounds - i’m neither black nor a journalist, but i would think that if i were either (or both) i’d know a huge waste of my time when i saw one.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        They’re legit trying to get him to freak out and yell the racist sexist shit that’s scrolling through his head all day.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 months ago

      Remember, he doesn’t like nasty questions. Like : “What do you say to Americans, who are watching you right now, who are scared?”

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This doesn’t work. I hope they’re not naive enough to think that’ll work. It doesn’t even matter what happens there. All Trump and his team want is the victory of him appearing there. They want the photo opportunity, they want the headline, they want to be able to say look the blacks love us. And they know nobody in their base is going to question it. They also know the vast majority of Americans won’t check into the actual events

  • cygnus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    5 months ago

    Important context for any here who might not read the article:

    The outcry led to the NABJ president, Ken Lemon, and others defending the decision, saying that Black reporters should have the opportunity to question a political candidate.

    “Every year, every presidential election cycle, we invite the presidential candidates to come,” Lemon said to NABJ student journalists on Tuesday. “We extend that to anyone who is a nominee and in this case we have two presumptive nominees. We invited both of them … This is an important hour. We have people whose lives are depending on what happens in November … This is a great opportunity for us to vet the candidate right here on our ground.”

    • Granbo's Holy Hotrod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s the constantly giving him a platform and not pushing back on his BS. But a quick google confirms that pretty much all candidates have spoken except tRump until now. He skipped it last time.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    ‘It puts everyone in a really bad position’

    Sounds like something you could say about nearly anything the man has done that impacts anyone other than himself.

    Personally, I understand their concerns, but I also think in the end it’s just going to be a good opportunity for Trump to show his ass and then strut around like he’s done something we should all be impressed by. (as usual)

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago
    The Guardian Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

    The Guardian is rated with Medium Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: Mixed
    Country: United Kingdom
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.