• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    You posted a link not the content you claim proves your point. I in similar fashion posted a link to Wikipedia which I claim proves my point.

    • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sorry pal, this just further proves you’re not here to have a rational discussion.

      The more you reply the sadder you look.

          • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            You still won’t provide the quote you claim proves your point. Just admit you read through the source and realized you misread it.

            • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              I provided two sources of information, you just don’t like them.

              I will gladly join you in this circular argument as long as you want to stubbornly make it.

                  • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    You didn’t post proof, you posted a link you claim is proof but you can’t seem to quote which part is proof.

                    There are two possible reasons, one you are incredibly lazy, or two you know there is nothing to support your claim and decided to take claim some moral high ground as to why you won’t post the quote.