• jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      You still won’t provide the quote you claim proves your point. Just admit you read through the source and realized you misread it.

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I provided two sources of information, you just don’t like them.

        I will gladly join you in this circular argument as long as you want to stubbornly make it.

            • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              You didn’t post proof, you posted a link you claim is proof but you can’t seem to quote which part is proof.

              There are two possible reasons, one you are incredibly lazy, or two you know there is nothing to support your claim and decided to take claim some moral high ground as to why you won’t post the quote.

              • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                It’s not my job to read you a bedtime story, you’re a big boy. Do it yourself. I provided the information and it’s now on you to review it, or move on with your life. I really don’t care which.

                • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  More excuses. I did review it, which is why I trying to figure out what you think proves your point but you’re too lazy or scared to post it.