During a United Nations Security Council meeting this week, U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield launched a full-throated condemnation of Russia’s bombing of Ukraine’s largest children’s hospital on Monday. The attack was a part of a Russian bombing campaign that killed more than 30 Ukrainian civilians.

“We’re here today because Russia … attacked a children’s hospital,” Thomas-Greenfield said. “Even uttering that phrase sends a chill down my spine.”

Thomas-Greenfield went on to list a string of Russian attacks on other Ukrainian hospitals throughout the war. She described Russia’s aggression as a “campaign of terror” and labeled its attacks on civilian infrastructure as violations of international law. Representatives of other countries, such as the United Kingdom and France, echoed Thomas-Greenfield’s denunciations. (Russia’s ambassador denied responsibility for the Monday bombing.)

“I’m very glad the U.S. is coming out and so vocally condemning all of those actions,” said Jessica Peake, an international law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Law, referring to Thomas-Greenfield’s comments toward Russia. “But at the same time, we don’t get any language anywhere near as strong as that when we’re talking about Palestinian hospitals, or Palestinian schools, or Palestinian children.”

  • nova_ad_vitum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The Geneva convention isn’t relevant to Israel’s current war in Gaza. Blowing up hospitals remains immoral. Sorry if you don’t like it.

    • Carrolade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      War is immoral, everything about it. No exceptions. Humanity does not function based on universal morality though, it functions on law.

      • nova_ad_vitum
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        There are no laws governing Israel’s conduct in Gaza at this moment , and unconditional US support ensures that this will remain the case. You’re purposely talking about irrelevant nonsense to deflect from their obviously immoral acts.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, I’m not talking about irrelevant nonsense, I’m talking about war as it pertains to a war. Note, I have said several times that what is happening is very immoral. This is not deflection.

          Additionally, international law certainly applies, the ICJ has jurisdiction to try war criminals regardless of where they are.

          • nova_ad_vitum
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That jurisdiction doesn’t matter for Israel so long as they enjoy unconditional support from the US. Why do you insist on talking about shit that doesn’t matter?

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Couple reasons. First, that’s just false. The US cannot prevent an ICJ ruling, and it would definitely impact Netanyahu’s govt on multiple levels with a great many countries including his own. Second, US support is not actually unconditional, as we saw when the bomb shipments got paused. US support is still partial, and could become either stronger or weaker.