Alt text:

An idling gas engine may be annoyingly loud, but that’s the price you pay for having WAY less torque available at a standstill.

  • hswolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    I’m all for efficient public transports in downtown, I use them daily myself, but people on suburbs won’t really see a benefit to this.

    On the other hand, just switching to electric is a nice start, otherwise we won’t be able to live much longer.

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Especially people in suburbs would benefit from public transport and suburbs built for walk ability and cycling.

      • hswolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s the problem, only switching the transportation method isn’t enough, there’s a whole infrastructure behind that needs to be built.

        In most city centers you can kinda refurbish pre-existing systems, but in suburbs you need to build from scratch, and the distances are way bigger which imposes another challenge.

        Don’t get me wrong, im all for it, but we need to acknowledge these problems first.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah, unfortunately the Levitt-town style of suburbs (which are all that’s allowed to be built nowadays) are largely incompatible with public transport. We need to fix zoning laws to allow pre-war style suburbs to be built again to make public transport feasible. And all of this will take awhile to fix

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Suburbs are intentionally designed to not be walkable.

          To get to the neighbor behind my house, without cutting anybody’s yard, I have to walk about a mile. We aren’t far. His daughters play with my sons through our shared fence.

          And that’s a modest example. Plenty of cul de sacs that are “close” to the main street, as a crow flies but a lot further if you’re an East Asian Chinchilla Monkey running as fast as you can.

          • person420@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Love it or hate it, they aren’t intentionally designed not to be walkable, they’re intentionally designed to discourage traffic from driving through them.

            The reason communities like yours and the one behind your house aren’t connected is to reduce the amount of cars driving down your block. To make it safer for your kids to play outside.

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              The reason communities like yours and the one behind your house aren’t connected is to reduce the amount of cars driving down your block.

              Which is ironic because it has the opposite effect by forcing every resident to get around via car

        • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Correct. It can be done though. Getting stores and stuff into suburbs would help already, assuming we’re talking us style ones.