• Lyre
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Now there’s a hot take. Can i get your reasoning?

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        George Lucas can’t write dialogue to save his life. By the time of the prequels he was put up on a pedestal and nobody would stand up to him like they did during the original films.

        • Lyre
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ok I get that, but i might argue that at least the prequel writing has heart, and a purpose for the story. Do you genuinely believe the disney executive level writing in the sequels is better?

          • roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s less painful to watch. Meesa think you haven’t seen them back to back. As vapid as the sequels are I can turn my brain off and sit through them. The prequels bludgeon you in the face while watching them the entire time.

            • Lyre
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Meh, personally I’d still take the movie written by a human over the corperate ai, but i can see where you’re coming from. I dont exactly think theres a right answer when it comes to this particular debate