• Lyre
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Now there’s a hot take. Can i get your reasoning?

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      George Lucas can’t write dialogue to save his life. By the time of the prequels he was put up on a pedestal and nobody would stand up to him like they did during the original films.

      • Lyre
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ok I get that, but i might argue that at least the prequel writing has heart, and a purpose for the story. Do you genuinely believe the disney executive level writing in the sequels is better?

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s less painful to watch. Meesa think you haven’t seen them back to back. As vapid as the sequels are I can turn my brain off and sit through them. The prequels bludgeon you in the face while watching them the entire time.

          • Lyre
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Meh, personally I’d still take the movie written by a human over the corperate ai, but i can see where you’re coming from. I dont exactly think theres a right answer when it comes to this particular debate