Jay🚩@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoLet's Try BSD, Part 1 of 7: Introduction (FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, DragonFlyBSD)lowendbox.comexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1147arrow-down16cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1141arrow-down1external-linkLet's Try BSD, Part 1 of 7: Introduction (FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, DragonFlyBSD)lowendbox.comJay🚩@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square41fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareJay🚩@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·5 months agoAlso there is podmon (testing version), https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve & https://bastillebsd.org/ NetBSD prefers qemu as far as I know.
minus-squareLeFantome@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 months agoBut bhyve is a hypervisor ( VMs ) and Bastille is jails. Neither of those is a solution for running OCI containers.
minus-squareAsyx@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoI feel like the FreeBSD Community ist really underestimating how important OCI containers are in the Linux world. And how much easier they are to setup than vms and jails.
Also there is podmon (testing version), https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve & https://bastillebsd.org/
NetBSD prefers qemu as far as I know.
But bhyve is a hypervisor ( VMs ) and Bastille is jails. Neither of those is a solution for running OCI containers.
I feel like the FreeBSD Community ist really underestimating how important OCI containers are in the Linux world. And how much easier they are to setup than vms and jails.