Beaver to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agoCost by Protein Sourceimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1287arrow-down122
arrow-up1265arrow-down1imageCost by Protein SourceBeaver to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.mlEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-squareMartín@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoWhat’s wrong with reducing density through absorption (of water)?
minus-squareCheradenine@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoNothing at all. But it reduces protein density, so makes 25 grams of protein per 100 grams weight meaningless. No one is eating uncooked, dried pinto beans.
minus-squareMartín@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoThis is not a problem with the nutrition of foods, it is the metric that is poorly designed. One more argument against the chart
What’s wrong with reducing density through absorption (of water)?
Nothing at all. But it reduces protein density, so makes 25 grams of protein per 100 grams weight meaningless. No one is eating uncooked, dried pinto beans.
This is not a problem with the nutrition of foods, it is the metric that is poorly designed. One more argument against the chart