• breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 days ago

    That makes sense. If you made all weapons legal but say, barrels illegal alone, its effectively a weapon ban

    • Crampon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      The barrel is an essential part for the weapon though.

      There’s a great amount of different types of stocks available for modular rifles like an AR-15. Requiring a fixed stock would still allow people to own a gun if they want to. It just makes the gun more annoying to use.

      • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Im from the UK with very minimal exposure to weapons - and the example being a functional ban. But I think you’re saying that bump stocks aren’t essential as other stocks exist whereas a barrel is a barrel?

        • Crampon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Ye that’s right.

          You could have the AR-15 legal as a functioning weapon. But make requirements such as fixed stock and 16" barrel. Such requirements would make the rifle more life a semi automatic hunting rifle instead of a tactical assault weapon.

          Here in Norway you can acquire an AR-15 kind of rifle with many modifications. But the requirement is and active membership in dedicated shooting club. There are also requirements for activity in the club. If you want a regular rifle you can take a short course required for all hunters and buy the rifle after applying for a permit to the police.

          I think that’s fair as you regulate what kind of weapon people with different interests can have.