• CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    …which is the whole reason for doing the SMR within the natural reservoir and leaving the CO2 in there.

    • Mongostein
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      We could just give up on the idea that natural gas is “clean.”

      • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That used to be my thinking, but there’s a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited and we need hydrogen. Therefore, methods like the one described in the article as well as ex situ methane pyrolysis are worth investigating.

        • corsicanguppy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          but there’s a lot of natural gas ready to be exploited

          Sooooo money. That’s the exception to doing the right thing?

          • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.workOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You forgot to quote the rest of that sentence. We need hydrogen, which is easy to get from natural gas, of which there is a lot. The right thing to do is figure out how to use it without emitting greenhouse gases. The problem is the same whether we’re under the current mode of production or some hypothetical moneyless condition.