The reporter who broke the New York Post's bombshell story on the Hunter Biden laptop speaks out after the legacy media rejected the scandal during the 2020 election.
Well you won’t answer why Hunter is even relevant politically enough for you to comment on it. Without that answer I have nothing to agree or disagree with.
Wow the delusion with you is so strong. Rather than just answer my question you have decided to focus solely on a single statement and construct a narrative around that to feel superior.
I’m trying to establish a base line and work from there but you’re so caught up in your little question, thinking you have some gotcha, you can’t respond to anything else.
So here’s the response to your question of why you should care about Hunter, even though your actions show you do.
Caring about something is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s worthy of you caring. Further you caring is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
I’m trying to establish a base line and work from there but you’re so caught up in your little question, thinking you have some gotcha, you can’t respond to anything else.
I’m simply being consistent. Sorry if that’s difficult for you to handle.
So here’s the response to your question of why you should care about Hunter, even though your actions show you do.
More projection, I’m asking you for your reason as to why Hunter is even relevant, not why should I care. Once again you have the smallest possible understanding of the question but take that and twist it to fit your narrative.
Caring about something is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s worthy of you caring. Further you caring is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
Interesting:
So why do you care enough to comment here at all?
When have I been dishonest? Please provide examples.
Again, I’m not asking why should I care, but why Hunter is relevant
For a guy who likes to talk shit about my reading comprehension you’re pretty bad at comprehending what you read.
I’m simply being consistent. Sorry if that’s difficult for you to handle.
You disputed my original statement I’m just to verifying you didn’t know what you’re talking about when you disputed it.
More projection, I’m asking you for your reason as to why Hunter is even relevant, not why should I care, I’ll answer yours. I dont have some nonsense gotcha that I’m clutching to.
Replace care with relevant.
Relevance is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s relevant. Further your threshold for relevance is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
Better?
Even though you still haven’t answered my question. If Hunter is not relevant then why are you so invested. I’ll answer yours I don’t have some nonsense gotcha.
So why do you care enough to comment here at all?
As I’ve stated before shooting down all your ridiculous claims is entertainment. You make turd time fun.
When have I been dishonest? Please provide examples.
You claimed I stated there were good white supremists. Below is your lie.
You claim there are good white supremacists.
You’ve claimed I was gaslightning you and then in your very next reply claimed you never stated I was making things up. One of those is a lie.
Again, I’m not asking why should I care, but why Hunter is relevant
I don’t know why he’s relevant to you and I don’t care to find out why, I just know he is.
If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have asked for sources for his emails. If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have disputed those sources. It wasn’t until your 5th reply after sources were provided that you shifted to why is this relevant.
Just keep making up lies, it’s all you got. We both know there was nothing incorrect about my original statement.
Gaslight <- You are Here
Obstruct
Project
Not a surprise you have nothing meaningful to say.
What from my original statement do you disagree with?
Well you won’t answer why Hunter is even relevant politically enough for you to comment on it. Without that answer I have nothing to agree or disagree with.
Gaslight
Obstruct <- You are Here
Project
I’ll take that as you don’t dispute anything in my original statement.
Once again you are asking for proof of something I never claimed to be true because you can’t find fault with my original statement.
Wow the delusion with you is so strong. Rather than just answer my question you have decided to focus solely on a single statement and construct a narrative around that to feel superior.
I’ve heard of safe spaces but this is remarkable.
Gaslight <— You are Here
Obstruct
Project
I’m trying to establish a base line and work from there but you’re so caught up in your little question, thinking you have some gotcha, you can’t respond to anything else.
So here’s the response to your question of why you should care about Hunter, even though your actions show you do.
Caring about something is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s worthy of you caring. Further you caring is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
I’m simply being consistent. Sorry if that’s difficult for you to handle.
More projection, I’m asking you for your reason as to why Hunter is even relevant, not why should I care. Once again you have the smallest possible understanding of the question but take that and twist it to fit your narrative.
Interesting:
For a guy who likes to talk shit about my reading comprehension you’re pretty bad at comprehending what you read.
Gaslight
Obstruct
Project <- You are Here
You disputed my original statement I’m just to verifying you didn’t know what you’re talking about when you disputed it.
Replace care with relevant.
Relevance is subjective and with your dishonesty there’s no way to determine if it’s relevant. Further your threshold for relevance is not an important metric to determine if a subject can be discussed.
Better?
Even though you still haven’t answered my question. If Hunter is not relevant then why are you so invested. I’ll answer yours I don’t have some nonsense gotcha.
As I’ve stated before shooting down all your ridiculous claims is entertainment. You make turd time fun.
I don’t know why he’s relevant to you and I don’t care to find out why, I just know he is.
If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have asked for sources for his emails. If you didn’t think Hunter was relevant you wouldn’t have disputed those sources. It wasn’t until your 5th reply after sources were provided that you shifted to why is this relevant.