• kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    6 months ago

    Of course he won’t. Anyone who expects him to have a shred of decency or ethics at this point is hopelessly naive.

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      A slightly less naive take is that we’re getting these statements on public record, so that we can take action on them later (assuming that day ever comes 😓)

      • Somethingcheezie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Take action how. By who.

        Only chance you have to fix the Supreme Court is by Biden appointing more justices like FDR did. And he better do it before trump packs the place as a safety measure. Or some one shoots all the traitors.

        • ALQ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Technically, Congress can impeach and remove, but there’s no way that will happen. They can barely agree to give themselves pay raises, which is just about the only thing they ever agree on anyway.

        • TeddE@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Impeachment by a future Congress was what I had in mind loosely. But I’m just one(1) person and not an expert on the subject. I suspect there may be options I do not see, but keeping a record is important to any future action on the matter.

  • DevCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Good. It just means we have no obligation to follow the rulings of an illegitimate court.

    • BertramDitore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s right. The Supreme Court’s legitimacy comes from our collective acceptance of their legitimacy. It’s a bit circular, but they stop being legitimate once we stop seeing them as legitimate. They have no enforcement mechanism.

      I guess it would take multiple blue states blatantly disregarding their rulings to effectively send that message.

      • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        The problem is that the cops and people with guns will happily enforce these rulings while we peasants can screw off.

    • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Right? And after all of Johnny boy’s grandstanding about impartiality and improving the image of the court and such. I wish someone would put each of these instances to Roberts like “ok so like how much shit are you full of? Are you unwilling or unable to get your boys in line? Because they’re making you look stupid bro”

  • Rottcodd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s cynically amusing that we’ve reached a point in US history that Supreme Court justices with no integrity don’t even bother trying to hide the fact that they have no integrity.

    I think that’s actually part of the vetting process when a new nominee is chosen. Most of the public focus is on ideology, but that’s likely just the first phase of it for the people reviewing possible candidates. It’s likely that after they get a pool of candidates who are ideologically acceptable, they actually look for a particular combination of arrogance and an utter lack of integrity, so they can, it is hoped, end up with somebody who will not only be corrupt and dishonest but defiantly and determinedly corrupt and dishonest - somebody who can just be set on whatever path they’ve been bribed to follow and then set free, and their own egos will take over and keep them on that path.

  • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hey no one kill me in the civil war I just wanna be gay, grow food and ride motorcycles and if you think any of those things are wrong well I guess you can shoot me.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If I had a deathnote… MAYBE I wouldn’t write his name in it, but only if he notices all the corrupt government officials suddenly having unfortunate accidents, realize he has a chance to be a better person than they were, and then acts upon that chance promptly.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Honestly id probably go full Light with the deathnote but in a “fuck all yous bitches” sorta way and not “im a god” type of way. Im an asshole not a lunatic.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Men like him don’t learn from things like that. The only way he would “learn” is if you specified he wrote a manifesto of regret, then committed suicide.

    • nova_ad_vitum
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      All these bigots criticising him are discriminating against Christians, and hate God.

      [Citation needed]