• madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Your eyes can’t possibly tell the difference. We’re past the max eye resolution at this point.

    • Fenrisulfir
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      What does refresh rate have to do with resolution?

      • Pyr_Pressure
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I imagine it was a typo*, but this article in Nature reports that in specifics circumstances the median maximum that people can perceive a difference may be around 500hz, with the maximum in their test possibly being as high as 800hz.

        Normally though it seems closer to 50-90hz, but I’m on the road and haven’t delved too deeply into it

        Edit: Type to Typo

        • Fenrisulfir
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          And nothing you’ve stated refers to resolution

          • Pyr_Pressure
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Not the original you replied to. And I had a typo when trying to spell typo 😂 just adding to the conversation. Wasn’t disputing you, just meant the may have meant refresh rate instead of resolution. Easy mistake. It’s still quite disputed how well eyes can tell the difference in refresh rates.