• SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Naa that’s literally the end goal. It’s pointless to sugar coat it.

    Because I’m not the one suggesting that companies be liable for what people do with their products. Way more people a year die from alcohol than guns (it’s like a 3xs as many) and alcohol has no other purpose but a vice, yet you’re probably not going to suggest that companies be liable for drunk drivers who kill people, nor are you going to suggest that they cover all the alcohol related health issues…are you.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          No, you haven’t. You’ve given some examples of how they are useful due to being tools designed specifically for killing, though.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yea sports shooting is totally useful because they’re made to kill paper targets and clay doves. Sure thing

            • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yes, it’s possible to practice using tools designed specifically for killing. Cars are tools designed specifically for transport, and people have contests for driving those, too.