No Canadian companies involved in a shortened workweek trial intend to revert back to a five-day week, new research from 4 Day Week Global shows.

  • hellishharlot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The 4 day work week is based on the idea that people are more productive with less time to goof off. Work 32 hours for the same pay and you should see the same or better outcomes. So likely the case is yes

    • bionicjoey
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I know that’s the idea, but I can’t imagine a lot of companies being eager to effectively pay their employees the same for 20% “less work”. I know it’s a good idea, I just have no confidence in companies. Just look how many of them forced people back to offices during the pandemic despite the safety, cost, and productivity benefits of working from home.

        • bionicjoey
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Again, I agree. I just don’t think suits will see it that way

          • Kichae@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of course they won’t, but that doesn’t mean that that’s what’s being discussed in these articles.

          • hellishharlot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            The suits are seeing it that way. Even if you don’t read the article, it’s in the headline my guy. They’re keeping the 32h work weeks

            • sarjalim@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not in the headline that they are paying the same salary though, which was the question.

              • snooggums@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                It doesn’t say they were paid less, and it talks about the same output, so the logical inference is that the salaries stayed the same.

                • propaganja@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I believe I read elsewhere that pay and everything else stayed the same which was the point of the trial. The businesses didn’t expect to like it but were so impressed with the results that they went ahead and kept it. It was an unqualified win for all parties.

                  AFAICT it really is as good as it sounds like, no gotchas.

            • bionicjoey
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              The headline makes it sound like a large number of companies, but it’s actually only a handful.

        • bionicjoey
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree, but that is true for working remotely as well, and look how few companies still offer that now. Most companies don’t like to make changes that make their employees lives better, even if there is no downside.