knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agoSad, but rulepawb.socialimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1298arrow-down16
arrow-up1292arrow-down1imageSad, but rulepawb.socialknightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 months agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-squareantidote101@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoRelative to much of the world yes. In terms of economics and neoliberalism mostly. You’re more right than wrong. In terms of social liberalism, the differences between the two parties are more noticeable. This is because structural politics is defined by undemocratic means, interests, and forces. So we vote on more superficial aspects, such as the culture war and social rights. Which can be important, but most of the time aren’t the real meat of the world’s problems.
Relative to much of the world yes.
In terms of economics and neoliberalism mostly.
You’re more right than wrong.
In terms of social liberalism, the differences between the two parties are more noticeable.
This is because structural politics is defined by undemocratic means, interests, and forces.
So we vote on more superficial aspects, such as the culture war and social rights.
Which can be important, but most of the time aren’t the real meat of the world’s problems.