• RedSquid@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      The wiki page on it makes it sound like shit tbh:

      A reviewer argued that the supposed protagonist makes illogical and emotion-based arguments against incorporation while the supposed antagonists and defenders of the incorporation system make sensible and logical economic arguments that the system allows humans to reach their full potential through monetizing human capital, increasing the scope for more voluntary transactions, and gains from trade.[2]

      • deleted by creator@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I read it a few years back, it was meh enough that I didn’t bother with the sequels and I read 2-3 books a week so thats saying something.