A reviewer argued that the supposed protagonist makes illogical and emotion-based arguments against incorporation while the supposed antagonists and defenders of the incorporation system make sensible and logical economic arguments that the system allows humans to reach their full potential through monetizing human capital, increasing the scope for more voluntary transactions, and gains from trade.[2]
The wiki page on it makes it sound like shit tbh:
I read it a few years back, it was meh enough that I didn’t bother with the sequels and I read 2-3 books a week so thats saying something.