• AlexanderESmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t care who it is, they give the information, then authorities verify it. If it comes up verified, there you go.

    • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is how you end up with police making up an “anonymous tip” which allows them to gain a warrant and dig through the personal possessions of anyone they don’t like.

      The problem isn’t solve with anonymity, but by actually protecting the whistle blowers.

      • AlexanderESmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        7 months ago

        The authorities should be able to dig through the possessions of massive companies that are fucking up so bad that planes fall out of the sky.

    • yeehaw
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sometimes you can’t verify things though

      • AlexanderESmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        Then it still doesn’t matter. If an identified source gives information that isn’t verifiable, it’s still not actionable.

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        We already have enough evidence to verify a lot of the horrible things that has happened at these two companies. So what you wrote might be true in some situations, but it has nothing to do with the issue at hand.

      • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        cmon honky what are we talking about, what is the current subject

        that’s right, they killed the guy who could verify the stuff

        like fn work with us here, geez ;)