• Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    And as a better option, use an actual device instead of a short lifecycle planned obsolescence embedded android device on a “smart” tv.

    • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is why I refuse to buy a “smart” TV. My old flat screen TV works perfectly fine with a Chromecast with Google TV. I can even use the Chromecast in my projector or any other device with HDMI input to make it smarter than most TV interfaces I have tried.

      • LinusSexTips@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        My cheapo dumb tv died a couple of years back, was a great bit of kit for $400au that gave me 10 years. I’ve got a “smart” tv at the moment which isn’t connected to the internet, and just serves as the display for my Shield TV.

        I’d probably consider an LG commercial / signage display as my next device, some old work connections can get me one as a special purchase through their distribution channels it’s just waiting out the current panel dying.

      • flubba86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I do the same, I use kodi on a CoreElec box on my 10 year old dumb TV. It works great, but my issue is it’s going to be extremely difficult to replace my TV when it gets time to upgrade. (Eg, if I want to move to an OLED, or QD panel). Every new TV on the market is a smart TV. It’s getting to the point that you need to buy a very large monitor, rather than a TV, to achieve the same setup.

    • m-p{3}A
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      At least the Chromecast with Google TV (HD) is cheap.