• foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 months ago

    Setup Fail2ban

    Login only with SSH keys. MFA on SSH login. Use SSH proto 2.

    Disable passwords, x11 forwarding, root logins

    Reduce Idle timeout interval

    Limit users’ SSH access

    That should be more than enough for the average use case.

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Regular updates are definitely necessary too. Also, if you do limit SSH users to a chroot make sure you limit TCP (port) forwarding too.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep. Use SSH keys, not just protocol.

        On connection, it’ll ask for your SSH password (this is different from the users password).

        After that with something like authelia in place, you’ll be asked for a 2fa code.

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          So, no. SSH can’t do 2FA? I would need to set up Authelia and connect through that? I already use ssh keys instead of passwords to connect to my server

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes it can. I literally have it set up right now.

            When I connect to my vps I am promoted for the password for my SSH key. Only works on a machine that has the ssh key.

            Then I need to use 2fa.

            • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Ah, so it the asks for the TOTP provided by Authelia? I misunderstood, sorry. That’s pretty cool. Do you maybe still have the guide you used to set that up?

          • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It is possible to have 2FA with a security key and ssh. Been on my to do list for some time to try it.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Don’t expose anything to the Internet that you don’t absolutely have to. If you can, put everything behind a VPN gateway.

    Make backups. Follow the 3-2-1 rule.

      • taaz@biglemmowski.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I wouldn’t recommend putting ssh behind any vpn connection unles you have a secondary access to the machine (for example virtual tty/terminal from your provider or local network ssh). At best, ssh should be the only publicly accessible service (unless hosting other services that need to be public accessible).

        I usually move the ssh port to some higher number just to get rid of the basic scanners/skiddies.

        Also disable password login (only keys) and no root login.

        And for extra hardening, explicitly allow ssh for only users that need it (in sshd config).

        • Poutinetown
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          Ssh behind a wire guard VPN server is technically more secure if you don’t have a key-only login, but a pain if the container goes down or if you need to access the server without access to wireguards VPN client on your device.

          • Lem453
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Highly recommend getting a router that can accept wireguard connections. If the router goes down you’re not accessing anything anyways.

            Then always put ssh behind the wireguard connections.

            For a homelab, there is rarely a need to expose ssh directly so best practice will always be to have multi layered security when possible.

            • Poutinetown
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah it’s good to have a system separate from the main server. It’s always so frustrating having to debug wireguard issues cause there’s some problem with docker

  • h3ndrik@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago
    • fail2ban / brute forcing prevention
    • quick, frequent updates(!)
    • containerization / virtualization
    • secure passwords, better keys
    • firewall
    • a hardened operating system (distribution)
    • SELinux / Apparmor / … / OpenBSD
    • not installing unnecessary stuff
    • An admin who is an expert and knows what they do.
    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s why “availability” is a core tenet of security (according to some cybersecurity course I took). It is easy to prevent unauthorized access to data if you have no requirements on authorized access.

    • perishthethought@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      … is an intrusion prevention software framework. Written in the Python programming language, it is designed to prevent brute-force attacks. It is able to run on POSIX systems that have an interface to a packet-control system or firewall installed locally, such as iptables or TCP Wrapper.

  • SirMaple_@lemmy.sirmaple.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago
    • crowdsec
    • SSH - change port, disable root login, disable password login, setup SSH keys using SK(YubiKey in my case)
    • nftables - I use https://github.com/etkaar/nftm to keep things quick and simple. I like the fact if will convert DNS entries to IPs. I then just use dynamic DNS update clients on all my endpoints
    • WireGuard for access to services other than SSH(in some cases port 443 will be open if its a web server or proxy)
    • rsyslog to forward auth logs to my central syslog server
    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      disable root login

      That does not do much in practice. When a user is compromised a simple alias put in the .bashrc can compromise the sudo password.

      Explicitly limit the user accounts that can login so that accidentally no test or service account with temporary credentials can login via ssh is the better recommendation.

      • drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think the point is that root is a universal user found on all linux systems where as users have all kinds of names. It narrows down the variables to brute-force, so simply removing the ability to use it means they have to guess a username and a password.

        • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          guess a username and a password.

          Security by obscurity is no security. Use something like fail2ban to prevent brute force. When you use a secure password and or key this also does not matter much.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Check out online resources such as the Nist cyber stuff.

    Basic things include disabling unnecessary services, disabling password authentication, setting up and verifying the firewall, configuring selinux and so on.

  • dallen@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I like to require access to 22 via IP whitelist and all services on SSL behind a reverse proxy. Doesn’t leave much surface to attack.

    • phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also, move ssh to a different, higher port. Since ssh isn’t exactly for noobs, changing the port is easy enough to work with and that alone already reduces port scans and what not

      • Nik282000
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I recently setup Guacamole (Web based VNC/RDP/SSH) with totp and was able to close external SSH access. Now everything I run can sit behind a single reverse proxy, no extra ports.

  • Pyrosis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Firewall and deciding on an entry point for system administration is a big consideration.

    Generating a strong unique password helps immensely. A password manager can help with this.

    If this is hosting services reducing open ports with something like Nginx Proxy Manager or equivalent. Tailscale and equivalent(wire guard, wireguard-easy, headscale, net bird, and net maker) are also options.

    Getting https right. It’s not such a big deal if all the services are internal. However, it’s not hard to create an internal certificate authority and create certs for services.

    If you have server on a VPS. Firewall is again your primary defense. However, if you expose something like ssh fail2ban can help ban ips that make repeated attempts to login to your system. This isn’t some drop in replacement for proper ssh configuration. You should be using key login and secure your ssh configuration away from password logins.

    It also helps if you are using something like a proxy for services to setup a filter list. NPM for example allows you to outright deny connection attempts from specific IP ranges. Or just deny everything and allow specific public IPs.

    Also, if you are using something like proxmox. Remember to configure your services for least privileges. Basically the idea being just giving a service what it needs to operate and no more. This can encompass service user/group names for file access ect.

    All these steps add up to pretty good security if you constantly assess.

    Even basic steps in here like turning on the firewall and only opening ports your services need help immensely.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The biggest thing is to change the defaults and to limit access. Unless your are the target of a nation state the attacks against your network will be automated.

  • lemmyreader@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ask yourself a few questions first before following the massive amount of suggestions and then locking yourself out and so on.

    • What are you worried about ?
    • How important is your stuff ?
    • Make backups and check them

    Still worried ? Then there’s the easy way out : Hire some security auditor to help you find holes you left.

  • Chyi@fasheng.ing
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Minimize installation and keep it streamlined. Update promptly. Choose applications that are still supported or have an active community.

  • LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do a search for you server OS + STIG

    Then, for each service you’re hosting on that server, do a search for:

    Service/Program name + STIG/Benchmark

    There’s tons of work already done by the vendors in conjunction with the DoD (and CIS) to create lists of potential vulnerable settings that can be corrected before deploying the server.

    Along with this, you can usually find scripts and/or Ansible playbooks that will do most of the hardening for you. Though it’s a good Idea to understand what you do and do not need done.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    IP Internet Protocol
    SSH Secure Shell for remote terminal access
    SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
    TCP Transmission Control Protocol, most often over IP
    VNC Virtual Network Computing for remote desktop access
    VPN Virtual Private Network
    VPS Virtual Private Server (opposed to shared hosting)

    8 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 9 acronyms.

    [Thread #693 for this sub, first seen 20th Apr 2024, 15:55] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]