• body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    In 2042 you’ll be 62ish or something I don’t wanna think about math, but that’s around the average American life expectancy and isn’t too bad.

    • smooth_jazz_warlady@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Maths understander here, in 2042 they’ll be 60, not 62. Also the average life expectancy in the US is around 77-78 years, i.e. enough of a difference compared to 60 that you could more or less fit (and live to see) a grandkid/great-grandkid’s entire childhood in there.

      Although that 79 years figure is Life Expectancy at Birth, in practice it tends to be longer for most surviving adults older than a certain point, mostly because the lower ranges of the chart hit their allotted moment and pass on for whatever reason, leaving the remaining average higher still

      Of course, with calculus living rent free in my head rn thanks to the uni course of the same name, I’m wondering what that chart of “current age vs expected remaining age” looks like, and where the point of “ageing faster than your remaining likely time grows” lies

      Edit: source turned out to be a little out of date (although they always tend to bicker a little on the exact number), corrected for it