Tehran views the attack as equivalent to an attack on its own territory, so a direct response on Israeli soil by Iran itself is a serious possibility
Countries including India, France, Poland and Russia have warned their citizens against travel to the region, already on edge over the war in Gaza ⠀
“The revenge will come,” wrote Israel’s largest daily newspaper, Yedioth Ahronoth. “For the moment, the premise is that it will be very soon, in the next few days.” ⠀
“It’s going to be very difficult for Iran not to retaliate,” said Raz Zimmt, senior researcher at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies.
“I still believe that Iran doesn’t want to engage in full-scale, direct military confrontation against Israel, and certainly not with the United States. But it has to do something.” ⠀
Iranian sources and diplomats from the United States, Israel’s main protector, say Tehran has signalled to Washington that it wishes to avoid escalation and will not act hastily.
But the risk remains that any response might spin out of control. ⠀
Iran has missiles capable of hitting Israel directly and in recent weeks, Israel has bolstered its air defences, which have intercepted thousands of rockets fired by Hamas from Gaza and by Hezbollah from Lebanon.
I get that the paper is trying to thread carefully. But Iran doesn’t just “view” the attack as equivalent to an attack on its own territory. Internat law does.
Internet law?
Lol nice, yeah international law, obviously. I’m leaving it!
I’m curious about that.
Could you point to the law, section and paragraph saying that? That’s a good argument for me to use in conversations
This blog says that an embassy is the property of the sending nation, and enjoys diplomatic immunity, but that it is still part of the host’s territory. They cite articles 21-25 of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
deleted by creator
They want Iran to retaliate so they can use it as justification for escalation.
“We need to secure Gaza and the West Bank to protect it from Iran”
deleted by creator
Netanyahu wants the war to escalate and Joe Biden will support and defend Netanyahu in every war crime.
Joe Biden not putting a leash on his rabid attack dog is the reason this is happening.
-
the provocation was deliberate
-
they can position themselves as threatened/defending themselves (no reasonable person thinks Gaza poses an existential threat to Israel)
-
they can draw the US into defending them
-
this will dampen/limit US backlash against the Gaza genocide
-
Netanyahu needs the war to go on because it helps him stay in power and away from being prosecuted, US entry could achieve that
deleted by creator
I don’t think they need a full war, just enough skirmishing to take up all the oxygen. Kind of like how international attention went off Afghanistan when the US invaded Iraq.
deleted by creator
On the other hand Iran is not very stable politically and a war can be the last straw and I think their political elite thinks very carefully how to retaliate, like showing the world they aren’t weak and at the same time not triggering more global war.
This doesn’t change the fact that Israel’s action was absolutely reckless and irresponsible, even towards their own population.
deleted by creator
And in a way it feels that we are on the verge of another world war and I really hope I am wrong about that.
-
I mean right now with the war in Gaza, don’t they have enough on their plate?
No. If Israel is ever threatened, they will have the full backing of the US military.
It’s better Americans die than zionists give up their religious nationalism.
Maybe it’s the spoiled brat syndrome.
The best thinks he can attack everyone because his Daddy never put any limits
deleted by creator
squinting at post title
Embassies are universally treated as the territory of the embassy’s nation. That’s why ppl can jump into the embassy of some country without an extradition treaty and say “lol you can’t get me now, coppers!”
Iran doesn’t view the attack as on its territory, the attack was on its territory.
This is how actual wars begin. An attack on an embassy, then a retaliatory attack, then a huge attack in retaliation of the first retaliatory attack, and then war.
