Hamas has indicated it is currently unable to identify and track down 40 Israeli hostages needed for the first phase of a ceasefire deal, according to an Israeli official and a source familiar with the discussions, raising fears that more hostages may be dead than are publicly known.
  • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2831·
    1 year ago

    So…

    Hamas gets hostages returned that are women, children, and elderly, all noncombatants.

    They get them back into Gaza where there’s no food and no zones safe from Israeli attacks…

    And Israeli gets back some of their boots on the ground war criminals so they can go right back to genocide?

    If you were trying to be sarcastic use a “/s”, otherwise people will think that was a serious comment.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish
        619·
        1 year ago

        I was quoting the article

        And I was explaining how combatants and noncombatants are different…

        One are victims of genocide, and the others are literally actively committing a genocide.

      • fukhueson@lemmy.worldBanned from communityEnglish
        23·
        1 year ago

        Can you please cite in your article the relevant section that supports:

        frequently to death

        Because I was not able to find such a statement, and I’m trying to parse editorialization from fact on this very serious subject.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldBannedBanned from communityEnglish
          42·
          1 year ago

          Israel/OPT: Horrifying cases of torture and degrading treatment of Palestinian detainees amid spike in arbitrary arrests

          Since 7 October, according to the Israeli authorities, four Palestinian detainees have died in Israeli detention facilities in circumstances that have not yet been impartially investigated. Two of the four are workers from the occupied Gaza Strip, held incommunicado by the Israeli army in military detention centres, whose deaths were only made public by the army after an inquiry by Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

          • fukhueson@lemmy.worldBanned from communityEnglish
            23·
            1 year ago

            This similarly does not support your original assertion, from your original article:

            “This ends in complications and sometimes even in the patient’s death,” the doctor wrote, Haaretz reported.

            Is there a reason you choose to embellish (and directly substitute words in the article for your own personal opinion) instead of accurately convey what the article says?

            • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldBannedBanned from communityEnglish
              32·
              1 year ago

              Me: israel tortures prisoners to death

              You: no israel tortures prisoners to death

              ???

              • fukhueson@lemmy.worldBanned from communityEnglish
                24·
                1 year ago

                This is flagrantly misrepresenting what this discussion is about as I’ve directly quoted. This is not conducive to informative discussion, and a disservice to this sub.

                • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldBannedBanned from communityEnglish
                  22·
                  1 year ago

                  “You are misrepresenting the discussion by linking evidence and proving me wrong.”