A shocking story was promoted on the “front page” or main feed of Elon Musk’s X on Thursday:

“Iran Strikes Tel Aviv with Heavy Missiles,” read the headline.

This would certainly be a worrying world news development. Earlier that week, Israel had conducted an airstrike on Iran’s embassy in Syria, killing two generals as well as other officers. Retaliation from Iran seemed like a plausible occurrence.

But, there was one major problem: Iran did not attack Israel. The headline was fake.

Even more concerning, the fake headline was apparently generated by X’s own official AI chatbot, Grok, and then promoted by X’s trending news product, Explore, on the very first day of an updated version of the feature.

  • style99@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    186
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    People who deploy AI should be held responsible for the slander and defamation the AI causes.

        • ArxCyberwolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 months ago

          Parker, why does Spider-Man have seven fingers in this photo?!

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why I imagine Xitter lawyers arguing that was it was neither spoken nor “printed”, they can’t be charged?

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          how is it fear mongering when shit like this is happening? AI as it stands is unregulated and will continue to cause issues if left this way

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            7 months ago

            So will self-driving cars, the oil industry, and a bunch of others. The US is a plutocracy, and Musk has enough power to keep playing around with this, so that’s it. If you want actual change, either start organizing for a general strike or a civil war, since stopping Musk is not on the ballot, and most likely won’t be for either of your lifetimes.

            • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I mean, if your problem is just narrowly musk, the one guy, you don’t need a whole war; just one shot.

              I’m not advocating this, just pointing out, you know? Not that I have a problem with turning the class massacre into a class war.

              • maynarkh@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                The thing is, the vast majority of terrorist attacks and assassinations are organized by rich people using poor people as pawns to further their political agenda. Such things are rarely born from people who are in touch with society and are compassionate with others.

                9/11 was organized by rich people to get back at other rich people for attacking their business. Even today’s right wing crazies only exist because there is a propaganda machine running on obscene wealth whipping desperate people into a frenzy.

                • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  I don’t see what terrorism has to do with this. Unless you mean the practical definition of ‘things that upset the wealthy’. Which is dumb. I want a special scary word for things that upset me.

    • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well if you read OpenAI’s terms of service, there’s an indemnification clause in there.

      Basically if you get ChatGPT to say something defaming/libellous and then post it, you would foot the legal bill for any lawsuits that may arise from your screenshot of what their LLM produced.