You’re correct, that’s why they are not maintaining a browser engine.

They are forks of Firefox with relatively small changes, like default configs, telemetry disabled or Firefox sync and pocket removed.

That’s what you’re missing. Those are not language models nor use neural networks. At best they use a classification NLP. They do not generate text, use pick pre-constructed answers based on the inputs. Because it this three’s no confidence beyond “what’s generally the correct based on this keyword”

I’ve worked with IBM Watson. That existed and was used for basic bots a decade ago. You have you manually feed the terms to outputs.

Y he usado la web de la agencia tributaria para confirmar lo que digo.

Librewolf, Mullvad, Tor, Snowwassel… There’s more than one Firefox. Surely if some fucked up AI integration was included, one of them would just disable it.

It’s not the same to continue with the joke and to completely miss the point and complain about it.

The first is funny, the second is sad. I believe I had to clarify that for you

There’s still some Russia left. But hopefully Ukraine will change that soon :)

I was rejected for a Master. I asked to know why and they told me it was because I needed a bachelor degree to apply.

I had two. At the very top of my résumé. At least they accepted me after I pointed that out.

1. I don’t think this is the proper channel for feedback.
2. Rude
3. Fuck you. This is an optional extension for those who want to try. Do you want the final version of a piece of free software? Then you can go lie in a ditch because hopefully it will continue to evolved for years. It’s astonishing the entitlement of some people.
4. Good local LLM that can run on most hardware is a very interesting project. Usually you need at least a GPU to get it to run. The fact that is only summarizing might be because it this.

Considering how google is making chrome worse every day, they could do only security updates and still be the best browser.

The revolution is that they are doing something that has existed since the early 1900s… But it’s in Barcelona so it’s chic.

It’s cool and all that, and likely just a side effects of the new trains having that.

I’m still not paying a full ticket, I’ll wait until I can see a whole basilica.

The example you shared is not an LLM. It’s a classic chatbot with pre-defined answers. It basically knows keyword to KB article. If no term is known, it will tell “I don’t know”. It will also suggest incorrect KB if picks one keyword, ignoring the rest of the context. It has no idea of the answer is correct by any means. At best somebody will periodically check a sample of questions that the user didn’t consider correct to evaluate the pairings, but it’s not AI, at least not a good one

I’ll give you one up vote.

lemme play a song on the world’s smallest violin ocarina.

I dismissed your idea because it’s bad. I decided to not waste my time explaining on the basis of the language you use.

The fact that I have to clarify this confirms I made the right decision.

I’m not taking scientific inputs by somebody who starts sentences with “bro”.

You need to put the heat somewhere. In the vacuum, heat can only transfer by radiation, which is much less efficient.

It is notoriously hard to cool things in space. There’s no water or air to dump the heat.

So no harm, noted.

Pay to be the “truth” on a fact checking tool? Fox news is very interested.

It’s… Challenging. Like the pet eating thing, there are many sources saying it’s true and many saying it’s false. Official sources can lie (Russia came to mind for no reason whatsoever), so we rely on sources we already trust, which is tricky and even subjective.

I imagine that “if in Fox then False” is a good start, but aside from that I can only think it getting extra sources, also a challenge without real time web crawling of the internet, were google and Microsoft are already light years ahead.