• TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    87
    ·
    8 months ago

    No, but saying they deserve what they get removes all responsibility from Tesla to actually deliver on their promises at the point of sale. Basic functionality is inherently one of those.

    Of course Cybertruck buyers should be expected to have to put up with some crap for being early adopters of such obvious bullshit, but that doesn’t mean they should have a truck that breaks down while driving away from the dealership.

    • remotelove
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      (Lulz. This guy thinks that companies are held accountable for crappy products.)

        • MoonManKipper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          The best way is to return said crap, get a refund, and then publicly complain about. That’s the main feedback loop. If the owners won’t do that then they don’t deserve a lot of sympathy.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            The OP article is about forum posts where people are publicly complaining about it. I bet if you go into those you’ll find stories of abysmal customer service from Tesla, pushing repairs with ridiculously long wait times over refunds.

    • jmankman@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t know what you expect from a vehicle that had the developers literally come out and say “yeah we didn’t crash test it and have no plans to”