• drislands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m down for technology making use of otherwise-unused energy is great. But that prompts the question – is the oxygen it’s pulling from unused energy? Could this negatively affect the oxygenation of blood?

    • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      8 months ago

      Probably. But if it means that you can have a lifetime heart pacemaker without ever changing batteries or external charging ports, that may be convenient. I mean, the tradeoff here is probably for people that are worried about more severe things than being a bit slower when jogging.

      • Vex_Detrause
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Doesn’t a pacemaker last like 10 years now? It would still need battery I guess even though it charges by blood oxygen. Imagine having carbon monoxide poisoning but what killed the patient was the pacemaker that died.

        • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          Doesn’t a pacemaker last like 10 years now?

          Yes, but a nuclear pacemaker can last a lifetime.
          A bio-battery has that same advantage without containing a radioactive sample that needs to be removed when you die.