• Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tiktok has some serious problems with censorship. It’s been absolutely proven that Tiktok censors content that the Chinese government dislikes. Even if Tiktok/Bytedance insists that they aren’t owned by the Chinese government, they are owned by Chinese entities, which subjects them to Chinese government censorship, and may require them to deny that censorship.

    The study: https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/A-Tik-Tok-ing-Timebomb_12.21.23.pdf

    Article about the study: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/21/business/tiktok-china.html

    Antipaywall link to that article: https://archive.ph/MLATC

    I don’t disagree that Facebook, Youtube, and Twitter have their own set of things they censor. I don’t disagree that Tiktok is being singled out by Congress. I don’t disagree that there are big privacy problems with all of the above platforms.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m not gonna suggest that it’s right that US companies often evade government scrutiny and action, but I also don’t think it’s hypocritical for a country to be interested in protecting itself from other countries. That’s just national interest. We need protections within the country too, but that’s not the same conversation.

    And tbh, the meme is pretty on point because a family may treat each other poorly often, but they are much less accepting of an outside party doing the same as it can be seen as a risk to the group at large.

    • MagnyusG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      people seem to glaze over the fact that China is at odds with the United States politically, the ban has little to do with protecting people’s privacy and more to do with preventing another country from having such an influential tool ready at their fingertips.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Also I know it’s the whole “you are not immune to propoganda” meme but look at the reactions to this bill online. If this isn’t proof enough that ByteDance has the tools and ability to push an agenda through their app idk what is, and the U.S. has already had enough problems with foreign interference. If we cannot trust ByteDance not to retaliate against the U.S. when profits are on the line, they probably shouldn’t be trusted with so much control on what our citizens are watching and hearing.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t like this bill because it’s another bandaid solution to a systemic problem. Okay, so we ban Tik Tok, but that won’t stop Chinese and Russian actors from using other social media to do the same thing. If Tik Tok is a problem then so are Truth Social and Parler.

            • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Except I don’t consider this to be “good.” There’s already rumors about people in the US buying Tik Tok to get around this ban. They’ll be doing the same bullshit but because it’s American bullshit it’s suddenly okay.

              I don’t want Steve Mnuchin to have my data just like I don’t want the CCP to have it.

              • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I don’t want Steve Mnuchin to have my data just like I don’t want the CCP to have it.

                That’s not hard to get around though. It just costs money because most of everything you consume on the internet is free because sites make money through ads.

                Use a VPN, Firefox, disposable emails and usernames, and you’re already 95% of the way there. None of it is magic, propaganda is generally pretty damn obvious, look at what you’re viewing through the lens of reality and not the bias of wherever you’re seeing it.

                • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Okay, how about this: I don’t want Steve Mnuchin to be able to influence elections just like I don’t want the CCP to be able to do it.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          From the outside looking in, I’m sorry but the opposite is evident. How fast older Americans are rushing to setup their own firewall, making one thing illegal in America is crazy.

          We’re heading towards a world where just like China blocks Facebook, America has its own firewall to block tiktok. Two sides of the same coin.

          Tiktok was the one platform that young Americans were able to organize politically, and the older Americans are going against everything America is supposed to stand for to stop that happening.

          • Ech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            8 months ago

            Tiktok was the one platform that young Americans were able to organize politically

            True or not, this statement is hilarious. If the 10-second video trend platform getting blocked ruins your political machinations, they weren’t particularly stable to begin with.

          • djsoren19@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            China blocks a lot, lot more than just Facebook, so to try and conflate the two is disingenuous at best and trolling at worst. I’m also very skeptical of this idea that TikTok is the only platform where organization can occur. Maybe this pushes them to the Fediverse, or to more established methods like Telegram, but it’s not going to be this great silencing of young voices.

            I’d also like to point out that many of the media sources that are picking up on this as a horrible ban are owned by people who like to sow division like Murdoch, or are affiliated with ByteDance. Checking for unbiased sources is pretty big on a topic like this, and I would absolutely ignore anything posted on TikTok at a minimum.

            • echo64@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              We are heading towards a world where Americans are prevented from accessing a social media that the rest of the world can access. This is undeniable. It’s disingenuous to suggest that this is not like the Chinese ban on foreign social media’s.

              It’s worrying that people such as yourself are willing to take on the same playbook as a government you supposedly hate.

              It’s worth noting I am not American, I will not be affected by this ban. I just see America slipping into a bad place. You aren’t immune to propaganda, and you aren’t questioning this stuff enough. Next time, it’ll be for something you don’t guttrally hate, and no one will be supporting you then.

              • djsoren19@yiffit.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Maybe I just don’t want a platform controlled by a country actively committing a genocide to be able to shape the narrative around another genocide? Maybe I don’t want to offer a country that kidnaps and retrains dissidents access to data they can use to target foreign dissidents? Maybe I think that a power that actively targets American institutions with cyberattacks on a regular basis shouldn’t also have access to the minds of millions of Americans via an algorithm that is seriously, dangerously addictive?

                Like in what world are people seriously coming to the defense of China? What, we suddenly trust a dictatorship that openly and brazenly wants to destabilize Western nations? We trust that ByteDance is very independent and totally cool and doesn’t have to support the CCP at gunpoint at all?

                I think people are massively understating the power that control over these platforms offers, and massively overstating the impact they have. Massive protests were successfully organized way before TikTok, they will continue to be organized after it is gone. This isn’t the herald of the end of social media in the U.S. If anything, perhaps a Fediverse alternative could spring up to fill the gap, which is by far the best platform for organizing.

                • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The amount of sanity thats suddenly shown up in this thread is throwing me for a loop. Am i still on Lemmy here?!

                  More seriously, Chinese propaganda on here is all over the place in 3 forms,

                  1. The shit ur calling out: “ccp good, murica bad. Western media all propaganda, consume more state media from “leftist” regimes.”

                  2. The pre-deflection, “idk why ppl say russian/chinese propaganda is on lemmy, theres none to be found.” Quickly then backed up with another 1 or 2 echoing, “yeah, ive seen nothing of this nature here at all.”

                  3. And then the most difficult to convince the bystanders of, “if u think im parroting chinese/russian talking points, ur just a dirty neolib who hates true leftism!” Followed immediately by 15 more comments just underneath circlejerking over how leftist opinions are oppressed, all true leftists get called tankies but also tankies dont exist, and pretty much muddying the waters of what leftist theory is typically about (e.x. having a currency, market, and or billionaires is not antithetical to communism).

                • echo64@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  No one’s defending China. Everyone is calling out America’s hypocrisy and the slide into doing the same shit that China does. If anything, we’re trying to warn that America is becoming a China to fight China.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not to mention how the local area average content algorithm is a known tool of those foreign policing units to keep Chinese nationals abroad in line even when they specifically avoid downloading anything the CCP could normally use to keep an eye on them.

        People are getting mad that their right to participate in the extraterritorial oppression of Chinese folks is being infringed because it also involves them getting to watch videos of reddit drama stories set to shitty Minecraft parkour.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bull. Being at odds with someone is about protection. We should want our information to be free from whatever they want it for. I don’t like the bigger US companies doing it either. But that is usually for profit. Who knows what a foreign nation that hates us wants it for.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        8 months ago

        China is at odds with the United States politically

        Most sane and freedom loving people are also at odds with United States politically.

        I think the US government is upset that China has provided people with a way to communicate and organize that has actually been effective.

    • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I find it hypocritical that America forces it’s tech down other countries throats and demands open markets globally while wanting to now close off their market once they have a viable foreign competitor. I agree it’s logically the right move but, I still find it hypocritical.

    • tswiftchair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think the most hypocritical part is obviously the guise of data privacy. But even regarding national security or foreign influence, I think there is some hypocrisy because we know that there are foreign actors on Facebook, for example, as well.

    • NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Back in my day we had an open internet. But “China bad” has gotten to the point where we’re ok with the government deciding which countries are allowed to have apps in the US market. I definitely don’t see any problems with establishing that kind of precedent.

      If your worried about China influencing and/or spying on US citizens via a social media app, there are things the US could do short of a forced sale or outright ban (and not an actual ban btw, this is the government telling app stores what apps they’re allowed to carry, another super cool precedent). Maybe a public education campaign, like DARE but for tik tok, maybe it’s convincing influencers to switch platforms, maybe it’s dumping some money into alternatives like the fediverse. Or you could just wait a year or two until TikTok loses popularity like every other social media platform ever.

      Anyway, we need to stop pretending this argument is about anything like spying or Chinese mind control. For Republicans it’s simply China bad. For Democrats it’s about protecting meta and Google, donors, from TikTok kicking their ass in the free market.

      It’s dumb, short sighted, a horrible precedent, and people cheer it on at their own perril.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Europe should be prepared to ban Facebook and currently ban tiktok. American companies aren’t the same type of threat. Europe can reliably get them to follow their legislation.

      When it comes to the intelligence aspect. America will share it’s intelligence and intelligence capabilities with most of Europe. Even when it doesn’t, it’s intended outcomes are aligned with Europe.

      America supports Europes defence and economy substantially. In both things they are generally aligned. China doesn’t. It’s hostile to Europe and the US. China frequently performs industrial sabotage and theft against Europe and the US.

      Europe should be challenging Facebook more, but the problems with Facebook are the same issue US citizens face. Europe can trust that the American government and Facebook to follow it’s laws in Europe. Regulations don’t matter to tiktok, it exists as part of the state apparatus. It will only ever feign compliance.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Man the fuck is up with the amount of pro-Chinese-Dictatorship memes?

    Fuck the CCP, all my homies hate the CCP! Some other unethical asshole can buy TikTok and it’ll still be an improvement.

  • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    You know what? Good. Fuck China. Fuck the CCP. Fuck TikTok. My country borders China and has active territorial disputes with it. When I last went on Facebook I saw people from my country reposting TikTok content from China. They actually fucking support China in all of its territorial disputes, they think that China is the greatest country in the world and they want it to have the nine dash line basically. Really? Supporting a totalian regime, a hostile foreign power? Really?

    • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, 100%.

      There are way too many fucking tankies on this platform and they need to be reminded of this.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      If I download that app I am not doing it because I endorse any of the policies of the Mainland Taiwan I am doing it I want to get content.

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 months ago

    Way more people than I would have expected in here - a social media site who’s entire purpose is to be free from corporate ownership and control - upset this meme is too soft on China, instead of in agreement that legislators should be addressing the entire social media platform market (and china’s platform with it)

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s because they’re shipping all the user data back to China despite repeatedly promising they wouldn’t.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    To solve this problem, I’m thinking of just getting a dumb phone again, and maybe throwing out all of my other electronics. Actually, I’ll have to just move to the middle of the woods somewhere with no electricity to get actual privacy.

    Man this sucks. I wish we could all just mind our own business.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      We have never, at any point in human civilization, ever just minded our own business.

      • assembly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Don’t think that’s humanities M.O. we kinda tend to be in each others shit constantly. If there is anything we need to learn as a species it’s to focus on our own shit.

        • Neato@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          The only reason humanity has a civilization is its preoccupation with its members shit. You see this in some other intelligent group species. Wolves, apes, anything with group dynamics. Enforcing conformity was essential to survival. You can argue that’s no longer necessary, but it’s how we evolved.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      idk. i think you just don’t need all the “smart” devices in your hut in the woods. electricity is fine. we had solar panels in dumb calculators and dumb watches for >20 years. plus the dumb stuff needs even less electricity and is easy to repair. you can have a dumb mixer, dumb fridge, dumb washing machine, dumb dishwasher and a vacuum, just not a roomba that scans your home while it cleans.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Funny you mention dumb devices.I’ve been searching for a dumb TV now for a bit, can’t find them anymore. It’s so annoying that everything is connected to the internet now. I don’t need my entire life hooked into the internet.

        • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          yeah, anything media is hard to get without “smart” stuff, but you don’t need the bluetooth enabled shaver, trust me.

          i also bought a tv/monitor recently and the size and features i wanted were only available on a smart one, but i never connected it to the web. it just complains about it in a grey box top right every start. it probably uses a bit more electricity, because of a proper CPU running all the time.

        • wjrii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Probably not in stores, but you can get PC monitors up to about 43", and there are also “commercial signage” or “business” displays which are about $150-200 more than a similarly spec’ed smart TV from the same company (lots of Samsungs on Amazon), and may not come with a stand or possibly speakers. Some smart TVs also let you switch inputs without connecting to WiFi. I think most mainstream media projectors are not smart yet, though it’s creeping into that space as well. If everything else is already tracking you, I do tend to wonder how much worse the TV is, but there are ways to pay for a little less privacy invasion from your “TV.”

        • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’ve been searching for a dumb TV now for a bit, can’t find them anymore

          Every TV can be a dumb TV if you don’t give it your wifi password…

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    honestly, i just don’t really care, unless you want to try and argue first amendment, i think that’s the only realistic outcome here.