• Cort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wouldn’t the math would also suggest they could have retained 1/3 of the fired employees if they’d forgone the bonuses?

    If the budget is so tight that they have to fire hundreds of employees, why are bonuses deserved?

    • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wouldn’t be surprised if it was to make sure the experienced and mission critical people stick around, instead of jumping off a sinking ship. Downsizing can lead to a panic where you lose the people you vitally need.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, at this point we’re hitting a level of nuance that would require more information than I have. There was also the surprise budget cut somewhere along the way.

        • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Right. A company that can lose 800 employees doesn’t consider a few million to be that big a deal. Especially if it helps secure future income. Which is kinda the point of the whole thing.