• explodicle@local106.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which description? That Wikipedia article says “The aim is to provide an alternative to centralized platforms such as YouTube, Vimeo, and Dailymotion.”

        • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The difference to YouTube is that it’s not intended to create a huge platform centralizing videos from the whole world on a single server farm (which is horribly expensive).

          From their website. It’s a very different system, and also not funded by advertisers, which means someone else has to pay the bills.

          • explodicle@local106.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Is PeerTube’s purpose to replace YouTube?

            We can answer with certainty: no!

            The ambition remains to be a free and decentralized alternative: the goal of an alternative is not to replace, but to propose something else, with different values, in parallel to what already exists.

            They’re saying they’re not a “replacement” because it’s a decentralized alternative to something centralized. Not because it can’t serve the same needs for technical or economic reasons.