Oiconomia@feddit.de to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoHave enough money to solve almost any social issue, but put on a weird black latex suit and beat up the mentally unstable at night instead.feddit.deimagemessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up11.3Karrow-down148
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1imageHave enough money to solve almost any social issue, but put on a weird black latex suit and beat up the mentally unstable at night instead.feddit.deOiconomia@feddit.de to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square141fedilink
minus-squareDr. BoblinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up97arrow-down3·1 year agoScratch that. Dolly Parton. Her net worth shows as much less because she keeps giving it away.
minus-squareNo_Change_Just_Money@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down3·1 year agoI have to say: Ratio! Dolly wins by a landslide
minus-squareDr. BoblinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoTaylor squeaked by Cuban using that metric.
minus-squarexpinchx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·1 year agoThe upvotes have spoken 👍
minus-squareFeathercrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down3·1 year agoDoes Taylor actually do much? I thought she just hung out being a rich person and occasionally influencing people on social issues by her presence alone rather than by explicit action?
minus-squareoatscoop@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIn the continuum of “ethical billionaire” (as much as that’s possible) to “evil billionaire” she’s pretty much “neutral”.
minus-squareRicky Rigatoni 🇺🇸@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoCan’t melt steel beans
Taylor Swift. Fight me.
Scratch that. Dolly Parton. Her net worth shows as much less because she keeps giving it away.
I have to say:
Ratio!
Dolly wins by a landslide
Taylor squeaked by Cuban using that metric.
The upvotes have spoken 👍
Does Taylor actually do much? I thought she just hung out being a rich person and occasionally influencing people on social issues by her presence alone rather than by explicit action?
You’re correct.
In the continuum of “ethical billionaire” (as much as that’s possible) to “evil billionaire” she’s pretty much “neutral”.
Jets
Can’t melt steel beans