Maxxus@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year ago23,328 Rulessh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up1659arrow-down11
arrow-up1658arrow-down1image23,328 Rulessh.itjust.worksMaxxus@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square35linkfedilink
minus-squareBarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up57·1 year agoI always knew tomatoes were unoptimized
minus-squareKilling_Spark@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoGo with -Os to optimise for codesize
minus-squarebarsoap@lemm.eeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoOften faster anyways as the CPU is eating through instructions faster than the RAM can keep up with. May or may not require compiling as x86-64-v2, depending on code. In general, never trust performance you didn’t benchmark.
I always knew tomatoes were unoptimized
Someone compiled tomatoes without -O3
Go with -Os to optimise for codesize
Often faster anyways as the CPU is eating through instructions faster than the RAM can keep up with. May or may not require compiling as
x86-64-v2, depending on code. In general, never trust performance you didn’t benchmark.