The United States and Britain struck at least 30 Houthi targets in Yemen on Saturday in a second wave of assaults meant to further disable Iran-backed groups that have relentlessly attacked US and international interests in the wake of the Israel-Hamas war, American officials told the Associated Press.

Ships and fighter jets launched the latest strikes against the Houthis. The strikes follow an air assault in Iraq and Syria on Friday that targeted other Iran-backed militias and the Iranian Revolutionary Guard in retaliation for the drone strike that killed three US troops – William Jerome Rivers, Kennedy Ladon Sanders and Breonna Alexsondria Moffett – in Jordan last weekend.

US defense secretary Lloyd Austin said the military action “sends a clear message to the Houthis that they will continue to bear further consequences if they do not end their illegal attacks on international shipping and naval vessels”.

Archive

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    America is sure as hell not unrelated. They’re defending Israel politically, economically and militarily right as we speak.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      We’re not talking about “America”. We’re talking about individual people who are not engaged in the conflict.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        What?? They are still American military.

        Do you think everyone the US has killed in their stroked have been ck firmed to be personally involved in the red sea blockade?

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        Crying about individual US soldiers in a thread justifying dozens of airstrikes on Yemen. You think those strikes (or the thousands before it) only killed those directly involved in war? Or do you think only the relatively powerless have a moral obligation to avoid noncombatant (not even nonmilitary lol) casualties?

        • Drusas@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          You obviously haven’t read my previous replies because I have said it is all murder.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            Pro world peace then? Wow, very enlightened and useful opinion. While we all hold our breath waiting for that to happen, the murders will continue, and the belligerents and victims have different degrees of power and culpability.

                  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    It’s not bad, it’s just useless in this context. Honestly, worse than useless. If you’re just saying “all this killing is bad”, then it seems an awful lot like ‘both-sidesing’. Like no shit it’s bad, but it isn’t going to stop until we address the root causes. If you put for example, the Yemenis and the US on equal standing for the problems in the region, you are perpetuating the roots of this violence.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        American bases in the middle east are part of how they support Israel militarily (and genocide Yemen but let’s set that aside for now). While they weren’t directly involved, they are viable targets.