• TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Bad comparison.

      It’s more like buying a car, driving it for two years, then the manufacturer decides they no longer want to support the car so it auto drives off in the middle of the night

      No you can’t have a refund

      • Boxtifer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Don’t even need the auto drive off aspect.

        A better comparison is where the car will no longer start no matter what you do to it. But you own the body/frame.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        But like if someone stole it in those two years it would still be theft.

        It’s a perfect comparison, it’s just not proving what you think it’s trying to prove. It’s proving that the If/Then statement is wrong and makes no sense if you think about it. It’s not proving that piracy is theft.

        Piracy isn’t theft, but this isn’t why.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      If the rental car was advertised as a car you can own, you paid the price for owning the car and they get you on the fine print. No sir, then its not theft.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      No one expects to be the owner of a rented car. That why people ask “are you the home owner or a renter?”

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Do you go to a car store and pay full price to have the car in your car library indefinitely before having the dealer come say “sike, we’re taking that back”?