• DerisionConsulting
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    It already was legally distinct since it wasn’t made by the company behind pal world.

    That’s not the issue, or what that means here. “Legally distinct” in this context would mean that the product isn’t infringing on the IP, copyright, or trademark of a similar product. “Yellow rat” is fine, “Pikachu” is not.

    Go ahead and try to explain it using copyright and trademark laws all you want, but I don’t understand how a MOD that isn’t backed by a company can be arbitrarily blocked by another company.

    If someone ripped a verse or a chorus from a song, and uploaded it to Spotify, you don’t think that Universal could contact Spotify to take it down or block it?

    • bluespin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Mods are free and community-driven. This situation is closer to someone using the chorus to a song in their own soundcloud track, which in my opinion should be completely fine

      • Baggins [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You’re also not allowed to use someone else’s song to make your own soundcloud track.

        • bluespin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m not familiar with soundcloud’s TOS, which is why I noted that it’s my opinion. When did people decide it’s alright for multi-billion dollar corporations to dictate what people create for fun?

          • Baggins [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            It has nothing to do with anyone’s TOS.

            People decided that when they passed copyright laws and signed international treaties about it.

      • Zeke@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        IIRC, the mod wasn’t free. They were making money off of it using Patreon.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ignoring that this mod wasn’t free, that’s absolutely not in the neighborhood of legal.

        Nintendo is fully within their legal rights to send a DMCA takedown to every single fan drawing of Pikachu on the planet if they so desire. It belongs to them.