Guy Fleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months ago28 years ago todaylemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1192arrow-down16
arrow-up1186arrow-down1image28 years ago todaylemmy.dbzer0.comGuy Fleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·11 months agoAnything in Star Trek is canon if you want it to be. Even if you are totally and absolutely objectively wrong about it.
minus-squareNegativeNull@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·11 months agoAnything could just be a holodeck program. Anything is possible!
minus-squareIninewCrowlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·11 months agoOr an alternate universe, or transporter clones, or time shifters, or android copies
minus-squareummthatguy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 months agoDon’t leave out biomimetic lifeforms.
minus-squareentropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 months agoAnd a timeline that was overwritten
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 months agoCould be someone messing with The Guardian of Forever again…
minus-squarecybervseas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·11 months ago Even if you are totally and absolutely objectively wrong about it. Especially if you are totally and absolutely objectively wrong about it.
minus-squaresomas@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 months ago@FlyingSquid That is how o choose to interpret IDIC
Anything in Star Trek is canon if you want it to be. Even if you are totally and absolutely objectively wrong about it.
Anything could just be a holodeck program. Anything is possible!
Or an alternate universe, or transporter clones, or time shifters, or android copies
Don’t leave out biomimetic lifeforms.
and memory manipulation
And a timeline that was overwritten
Or just Q fuckin’ around.
Could be someone messing with The Guardian of Forever again…
Especially if you are totally and absolutely objectively wrong about it.
@FlyingSquid
That is how o choose to interpret IDIC