The SCOTUS needs to take this or a case like it.

  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    Funny, that isn’t what the article is about but thanks for not reading it.

    For some reason, liberals always want to talk about people’s genitals. What is your obsession with licking boots and thinking of other people’s genitals?

    • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If the article isn’t about genitals then what is it about? What’s the harm in using gender-affirming bathrooms if you take genitals out of the equation?

      I’m specifically asking you because I want to read your answer.

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        Why are you asking me when i stated no opinion that there is harm. You’re projecting a view on me I didn’t suggest.

        I don’t have a strong opinion one way or the other. I’m a man. One my coworkers is a trans man. He just goes to the stall and does his business.

        I get the concern women may have but that is an issue a woman would need to opine on.

        The general argument is safe spaces for women.

        It’s something scotus needs to address.

        • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          You claim there is harm, what harm is there?

          You claim you don’t have a strong opinion, but you want the highest court in the land’s opinion on what should be a settled matter? Seems like you have a pretty strong opinion, you just don’t want to vocalize it.

          If you remove genitals and sex from the equation (something you said to do), what about gender-affirming bathrooms makes them an unsafe space for women? Because at this point we’re talking chromosomal differences and nothing else.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            6 months ago

            I must have missed where I personally said that. Can you cite where I said that?

            • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              You can clarify here instead so as to avoid further confusion.

              When you remove sex and genitals from the equation, what are you left with that would cause an unsafe space for women?

              Maybe the traitorous sexual predator you want to give access to nuclear codes can help answer this for you.

              • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                6 months ago

                Let’s keep this simple. Why do you keep trolling? I’ve yet to state my opinion and you act like I said something I didn’t.

                • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I’ve given you multiple opportunities now to clarify but you just keep complaining about me.

                  I guess you have Futtbucker Derangement Syndrome

                  • Lookin4GoodArgs@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Boba

                    Warning: Violation of rule #1 and #3

                    If they don’t clarify, don’t put words in their mouth.

        • Pepsi@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          you need to supreme court to teach you about genitals?

          dude there’s tons of health textbooks.

    • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Funny, that isn’t what the article is about but thanks for not reading it.

      The article is about school policy of student’s use of their respective genders bathroom:

      “At issue was whether either the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which says that the laws apply equally to everyone, or Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in education, protects transgender students in that context.”

      It is absolutely what it is about.

      For some reason, liberals always want to talk about people’s genitals. What is your obsession with licking boots and thinking of other people’s genitals?

      Do you have anything better than a “no u”?

      • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        No. Do you not understand the difference between gender and sex? The school wants people to use the bathroom of their sex. Not their gender identity.

        Do you have anything better than a “no u”?

        Dude, you’re always talking about genitals and licking boots. It’s weird. Expect to be called out on it.

        So you disagree that scotus should address this issue? Or should it continue to be muddled

        • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Do you not understand the difference between gender and sex? The school wants people to use the bathroom of their sex. Not their gender identity.

          So in other words, it’s about genitals. Thanks for playing.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            6 months ago

            So you think trans people are just genitalia. That’s creepy and also offensive.

            • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              I do not. Try not to put words in other people’s mouths. You have a real problem with it.

              • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                It’s literally the only way they can argue on this topic lol. Twist your words until they can shit on you for having a poorly worded argument, negating the fact that their dumb ass took it there.

                We can all see it happening. You’re not subtle.

              • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                6 months ago

                Well you keep talking about genitals and keep talking about them. So obviously you think it’s all about genitalia since you keep obsessing over it. Trans people are more than their genitalia.

                • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  You are correct, so why restrict which bathroom they can use on this basis?

                  Furthermore, why would you want the SC to make this decision for them? Isn’t the conservative stance toward less government interference in citizens’ lives rather than more? Doesn’t restricting bathroom choice reduce personal freedom?

                  Why don’t you try to make an on-topic argument instead of just raging against anons challenging your view?

                  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    Interesting. You think you know my views. I’ve yet to state them other than scotus need to address the issue.

        • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          “The school wants people to use the bathroom of their sex. Not their gender identity.”

          Oh ok so it IS about genitals lol. You just said it wasn’t.

          Also I just looked at the other user’s history and the fact they’ve never used those terms prior to this conversation confirms you’re also just projecting.

          So you can’t comprehend your own source, then you can’t even do the most basic of projection well because you didn’t even look first to see if your accusation had a nugget of truth.

          Get better.

            • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Within the context of this article (and argument) they absolutely are, otherwise there would be no problem using the bathroom one feels most comfortable with. You just can’t agree to that without being wrong so feel free to keep arguing. It’s hilarious.