The SCOTUS needs to take this or a case like it.

  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Interesting. You think you know my views. I’ve yet to state them other than scotus need to address the issue.

          • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            From the article.

            At issue was whether either the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which says that the laws apply equally to everyone, or Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in education, protects transgender students in that context. The court’s decision not to intervene means that litigation in lower courts nationwide will continue, with judges reaching differing conclusions. The Supreme Court is likely to weigh in on the issue at some point.

            Only SCOTUS can clarify.

            • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Which part is unclear? Within the given context what about the 14th amendment and Title IX conflicts?

              You can not discriminate on the basis of sex, AND apply that equally to everyone, so what’s the problem?

              • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                10 months ago

                Gender and sex are not the same thing. Sounds like you agree with Indiana that biological men should use the male bathrooms since their sex is male.

                • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I said not discriminate, and to not discriminate equally, so you must be jumping through mad hoops to get to that conclusion.

                  • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    It isn’t illegal discrimination to keep males out of the female bathroom. It appears you don’t really understand the court case or the words sex or gender. Discriminate doesn’t mean what you think it means. It means to pick. As long as you don’t do it on a protected class, it’s legal. Sex is a protected class. Gender identify is not.