The Metropolitan School District of Martinsville, Indiana, had asked the Supreme Court to conclude that it is not required to allow transgender students to use the bathrooms of their choosing.
Funny, that isn’t what the article is about but thanks for not reading it.
The article is about school policy of student’s use of their respective genders bathroom:
“At issue was whether either the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which says that the laws apply equally to everyone, or Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in education, protects transgender students in that context.”
It is absolutely what it is about.
For some reason, liberals always want to talk about people’s genitals. What is your obsession with licking boots and thinking of other people’s genitals?
It’s literally the only way they can argue on this topic lol. Twist your words until they can shit on you for having a poorly worded argument, negating the fact that their dumb ass took it there.
Well you keep talking about genitals and keep talking about them. So obviously you think it’s all about genitalia since you keep obsessing over it.
Trans people are more than their genitalia.
You are correct, so why restrict which bathroom they can use on this basis?
Furthermore, why would you want the SC to make this decision for them? Isn’t the conservative stance toward less government interference in citizens’ lives rather than more? Doesn’t restricting bathroom choice reduce personal freedom?
Why don’t you try to make an on-topic argument instead of just raging against anons challenging your view?
“The school wants people to use the bathroom of their sex. Not their gender identity.”
Oh ok so it IS about genitals lol. You just said it wasn’t.
Also I just looked at the other user’s history and the fact they’ve never used those terms prior to this conversation confirms you’re also just projecting.
So you can’t comprehend your own source, then you can’t even do the most basic of projection well because you didn’t even look first to see if your accusation had a nugget of truth.
Within the context of this article (and argument) they absolutely are, otherwise there would be no problem using the bathroom one feels most comfortable with. You just can’t agree to that without being wrong so feel free to keep arguing. It’s hilarious.
The article is about school policy of student’s use of their respective genders bathroom:
“At issue was whether either the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, which says that the laws apply equally to everyone, or Title IX, the federal law that prohibits sex discrimination in education, protects transgender students in that context.”
It is absolutely what it is about.
Do you have anything better than a “no u”?
No. Do you not understand the difference between gender and sex? The school wants people to use the bathroom of their sex. Not their gender identity.
Dude, you’re always talking about genitals and licking boots. It’s weird. Expect to be called out on it.
So you disagree that scotus should address this issue? Or should it continue to be muddled
So in other words, it’s about genitals. Thanks for playing.
Dude probably doesn’t know what “genitals” means.
So you think trans people are just genitalia. That’s creepy and also offensive.
I do not. Try not to put words in other people’s mouths. You have a real problem with it.
It’s literally the only way they can argue on this topic lol. Twist your words until they can shit on you for having a poorly worded argument, negating the fact that their dumb ass took it there.
We can all see it happening. You’re not subtle.
Well you keep talking about genitals and keep talking about them. So obviously you think it’s all about genitalia since you keep obsessing over it. Trans people are more than their genitalia.
You are correct, so why restrict which bathroom they can use on this basis?
Furthermore, why would you want the SC to make this decision for them? Isn’t the conservative stance toward less government interference in citizens’ lives rather than more? Doesn’t restricting bathroom choice reduce personal freedom?
Why don’t you try to make an on-topic argument instead of just raging against anons challenging your view?
Interesting. You think you know my views. I’ve yet to state them other than scotus need to address the issue.
I keep inviting you to share your views. You alone have the power to rectify this situation.
“The school wants people to use the bathroom of their sex. Not their gender identity.”
Oh ok so it IS about genitals lol. You just said it wasn’t.
Also I just looked at the other user’s history and the fact they’ve never used those terms prior to this conversation confirms you’re also just projecting.
So you can’t comprehend your own source, then you can’t even do the most basic of projection well because you didn’t even look first to see if your accusation had a nugget of truth.
Get better.
Sex and genitals are not the same thing.
Within the context of this article (and argument) they absolutely are, otherwise there would be no problem using the bathroom one feels most comfortable with. You just can’t agree to that without being wrong so feel free to keep arguing. It’s hilarious.