I can’t give more approval for this woman, she handled everything so well.

The backstory is that Cloudflare overhired and wanted to reduce headcount, rightsize, whatever terrible HR wording you choose. Instead of admitting that this was a layoff, which would grant her things like severance and unemployment - they tried to tell her that her performance was lacking.

And for most of us (myself included) we would angrily accept it and trash the company online. Not her, she goes directly against them. It of course doesn’t go anywhere because HR is a bunch of robots with no emotions that just parrot what papa company tells them to, but she still says what all of us wish we did.

(Warning, if you’ve ever been laid off this is a bit enraging and can bring up some feelings)

  • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    74
    ·
    1 year ago

    That really isn’t true, and you would know that if you were actually familiar with HR.

    HR, for stuff like this, is just the messenger. Some exec told them to fire people, and gave them a directive on who to fire. The HR reps couldn’t answer her questions because they likely don’t know the answer.

    Yes, the job of HR is to protect the company, but mostly that’s protecting the company from the company breaking labor laws.

    But, I’m sure I’ll get downvoted to hell because the hive mind loves to shit on HR, which is exactly what the execs are wanting. They’re scapegoats.

    • alienanimals@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am very familiar with HR at multiple fortune 500 corporations.

      You’re so close to getting the point. You realize HR are the executives’ scapegoats. HR’s purpose is to serve the rich assholes fucking everyone else over. Anyone working HR is complicit whether they’re intelligent enough to realize it, or just a useful idiot. Execs want and need their scapegoats. People should realize this and avoid HR (class traitor) jobs.

      • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        HR exists to insulate people with real authority in a business from those who suffer from their whims. In a lot of companies, your job is to get yelled at so some ghoulish C level executive isn’t forced to strain their neurons processing the emotional reality of the fact that their decisions impact real people in negative ways. It might disrupt their “objectivity” and make it harder to issue layoffs next time.

      • ThyTTY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, if you’re working for that company in any other role your purpose is to serve the rich assholes anyway.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anyone in the company is serving the rich assholes fucking everyone else over. All the money they are producing goes to the rich assholes.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Better yet, get a job in HR and sabotage the company from the inside!

        Though, the reality is that most menial HR jobs are like any other menial non-decision maker jobs, in any other area of the business, so your argument is just as applicable to, and just as disingenuous, for most roles in any business — e.g. like arguing janitor’s at EvilCorp are complicit class traitors because they enrich EvilCorp and facilitate it’s success.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. Most jobs do not directly involve enacting bad worker related decisions.

          An engineer will never, ever come in and fire you for some made up reason. HR will.

          You are conflating the fact that HR does not need to exist like the jobs that do the actual work need to exist. They are not the same. Ever.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wouldn’t that also apply to engineers working for those rich assholes? Because there are a lot of engineers working for rich assholes here who like to trash HR, starting with me.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. What? HR does company dirty work. Engineers do actual work. What the fuck is the relation there??

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            They both prostitute themselves to serve the rich to get more money even though they are educated enough to have the freedom to choose whom to work for.

            • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ahh yes, and Marx wasn’t a real socialist because he sold books for money… You are choosing to miss the very obvious nuance and that is incredibly stupid to choose to do.

              • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re talking about nuance after the vast generalization you wrote about HR? May beyou could self reflect on that nuance notion.

                • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not the one failing to understand the difference between HR work and engineering work.

                  “nuance” was said in jest, because that diffrence goes FAR beyond nuance, yet you still don’t see it. Pathetic.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        31
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just don’t get a job in HR and no one can get fired. It’s that easy guys.

        HR is a legitimate job and serves and important purpose in the structure of a company. You can’t dismiss it by saying their purpose is to serve rich assholes because that’s the purpose of every job at a company. That’s work, that’s most jobs.

        • owen
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except HR’s entire purpose is to insulate management. They’re not exactly producing anything

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Production of goods is not relevant at all there are plenty of valid jobs that do not produce anything. Having an HR department in a large company allows other departments to focus on what they are good at and have HR handle all the employee contracts, hiring, firing, complaints, performance reviews, leave etc.

            • owen
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              All those tasks you listed are really the responsibility of management. HR is basically the grease between the decisions of upper management and the reactions of the lowly prawns

              • Fizz@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They can be the responsibility of management in smaller companies but at scale they require a department.

    • jimbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nothing you said contradicts the claim that HR people are class traitors. HR only cares about labor law so far as they can achieve management’s goals without landing the company in legal hot water. It’s absolutely not about any concern for the people themselves.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one in any business cares about their customers or coworkers any more than they have to. Why would you think that the person at the supermarket cares about the weird story you have to tell them?

        HR doesn’t care about you because they don’t know you. Your coworkers barely care about you. Do not think people you work with are your friends. HR has no moral reason to do anything other than their jobs. Don’t rely on them for legal advice. They are just a mouthpiece for what has already been decided.

    • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I worked in HR for a while and 80% of the job was telling managers/execs “you can’t do that to an employee”. It was defending the employee, arguing for better programs, planning events for employees/associates/team members. I paid for a Christmas event out of my own pocket one year because I was told there was no funding. I never got badmouthed or trashed by a manager. But after fighting everyday for associates it was really disheartening to see them say stuff like the person youre replying too. It’s one reason people who aren’t corporate shills get out of HR. You spend your day advocating for people and they turn around and spit in your face. After awhile you just ask yourself why am I turning myself inside out for these people who hate me?

      • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve literally never worked at a company where HR advocates for the workers. In 20 years, I haven’t seen it happen a single time.

        • asqapro@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          The HR team at the company I work for absolutely advocates for me and my coworkers. Their job is to protect the company’s interests and the workers being empowered is in line with the company’s interests. A close friend and coworker had a PM try to deny her benefits (both PTO and insurance) and HR stepped in on her behalf and forced the company to give her what she was owed. The HR team is always available to answer questions about how insurance works and how to plan for retirement, plus they go out of their way to host a yearly Christmas party and other major events. The companies you worked at might have had bad HR teams, but that doesn’t mean every HR team is bad.

          • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            HR is to prevent liability, not to protect or advocate for workers. Sometimes those lines end up crossing, but it’s not the job of HR.

            • GilgameshCatBeard
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              How about you let them tel you how HR is at the the place they work for since you have no idea who they are or where they work.

                • GilgameshCatBeard
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So tell me how the HR where they work at actually handled things since you’ve worked with them. Actually, first: state the name of the company they work at so I can check your work.

                  • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    8
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You’re not my boss, you can’t tell me what to do. I need my union rep present for this if you want to continue this discussion further.

          • GilgameshCatBeard
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            This totally goes against what people want to believe. It’s not being downvoted because it’s untrue, it’s being downvoted because the kids don’t like it.

      • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh come off of it. Your job is to tell those managers and executives “you can’t do that”. You are there to prevent liability. I’m not calling you a bad person or class trader like above, but that’s what your job is.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve interacted with lots of HR employees over the years. And for quite a while my wife worked in that field, so I’ve had some ‘inside’ insight into the field. And I largely agree with you.

      Like with any field, there are good people and bad people in there. My wife (and most of her colleagues) was one of the good ones. She intervened many times at her old job to stop out of control managers from firing store employees for bullshit reasons. Yes, part of that was to avoid the company getting into legal trouble for it. But an equal part was because she wanted to help these employees, because they were clearly being mistreated by their managers. And while not to that level, I’ve been helped by other decent HR people who went above and beyond company policies to help me during things like bereavement and healthcare needs.

      I’ve also dealt with some absolute shit-heel HR people. People who would spend almost all day spying on employees using CCTV to try to catch them doing something - anything - that they could write them up for. People who would go out of their way to hide and ignore evidence of managers vindictively punishing employees who they (the managers) didn’t like. People would use their power as HR professionals to exploit vulnerable employees for sexual motives.

      It’s a mixed bag. To say all HR people are good is facile (side note: I know you weren’t doing that). And equally, to slate all HR employees is also wrong.

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being a shield against the decisions of upper management is the kind of class traitor work the person above is talking about. HR’s job is taking that kind of decision and turning it into something that can be executed with the least likelihood of an office shooting or lawsuit. Whether either of those things are warranted or not.