• hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is cool, but plants are already a thing. This is just a new way to do something life has been doing for billions of years.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plants have a fixed life cycle. Unless we found a way to make all plants like bamboo, capable of growing at extreme speed (there are species of bamboo you can observe groing in real time with your naked eye), plants take a set time to absorb a set amount of CO2.

      The promise here is to syphon CO2 straight from the atmosphere into a solid state we can store, reuse or dispose of, safely.

      • hperrin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get that, but the title should be “Scientist Discover a New Way to Convert CO2 into Powder That Can Be Stored for Decades”.

          • hperrin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            They do. Pollen is plant powder. You can also just grind up a tree, but I’ll give you that sawdust is not naturally occurring.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  My guy, read your own link. Those are tri celled organisms, wikipedia even drew you a pretty colorful picture.

                  Just because the mediocre website used the word powdery doesnt make the living organisms a powder.

                  If I describe a leaf as feeling leathery, that does not make the leaf leather.

                  • hperrin@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Do you think that part of the definition of living organism is that it can’t be a powder? Also, do you think sperm are living organisms?

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Grab the torch, I’ll bring the pitchfork, and let’s ask the writer just why didn’t made the title less click bait.