• u_tamtam@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Per Capita equivalent CO2 emissions is quite high, but measurably on the decline as a result of more efficiency (mentioned in the article)

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Per capita CO2 is 4x that of China, and on top of it, USA is not particularly highly responsible for reforestation in the world, unlike Asian countries. Its just something I wanted to bring up because its not meaningful to have some progress with emissions of electric grids, if the CEO country of capitalism shits out too much CO2, pollutes the world, does not care much about reforestation and has probably half the population that thinks global warming is a myth.

      • u_tamtam@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Per capita CO2 is 4x that of China

        Sorry, I can’t leave your message uncorrected:

        https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita?tab=chart&time=1966..latest

        The USA is at 15t per Capita, on a steep decline, China is at 8t per Capita and growing fast. The EU is at 6.2t and equally on a steep decline.

        https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-of-cumulative-co2

        From this we can easily plot a trajectory where China might, within a couple decades, overpass both the EU (earliest industrialized nations) and the US (largest economy) and become the largest CO2 emitter in the history of mankind.

        IMO, no large historical polluter should get away scot free, but it’s certainly much worse to reach that point during the 21st century, when climate change is known and feared, and when clean energies are abundant.